The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Self-harm and overcrowding among prisoners in Geneva, Switzerland
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: Prison institutional conditions affect risk for self-harm among detainees. In particular, prison overcrowding may increase the likelihood of self-harm by creating competition for resources, space, and enhancing a "deprivation state." The purpose of this paper is to examine the association between overcrowding and prisoner acts of self-harm. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This cross-sectional study took place at Geneva's pre-trial prison (capacity:376) between 2006 and 2014. Outcomes were acts of self-harm that required medical attention, and self-strangulation/hanging events (combined into one group, as these are difficult to differentiate). Dichotomous predictors were overcrowding index- annual mean daily population divided by capacity ( > 200 percent vs < 200 percent), and year group (2006-2009 vs 2011-2014). FINDINGS: Self-harm and self-strangulations/hangings increased in 2011-2014 compared to 2006-2010 (p < 0.001). Overcrowding in excess of 200 percent was associated with self-strangulation/hangings (p < 0.001) but not with all self-harm events. In terms of pertinent demographics that would affect self-harm, there was no prison change in gender, area of origin, foreign residency, religion, or psychiatric treatment. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The present study is limited by the definition and identification of self-harm. The distinction between self-strangulation and self-hanging, and the precise classification of an intent to die is difficult to make in practice, especially with limited prison data records available. The relevant literature addresses the complexity of the association between non-suicidal and suicidal behavior. Despite this, the combined category self-strangulations/hangings gives some indication of severe self-harm events, especially since the methodology of categorization employed was consistent throughout the entire period of the study. Other limitations include the small sample size and the lack of individual patient data and prison data to help control for confounding factors. Despite these drawbacks, pertinent data (socio-demographics and number of prisoners treated for mental health and drug abuse) remained stable over the years. Thus, there are no apparent changes in the inmate population that could be linked to an increase in self-harm. High-security placements and mean prisoner stay have increased over time, with a decrease in staff to prisoner ratio - and these must be looked into further as contributors. Additionally, qualitative methods such as semi-structured interviews and focus groups could delineate the impact of overcrowding on prisoner well-being and self-harm potential. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The authors observed a significant increase in self-harm and self-strangulation/hangings over time, and overcrowding was significantly associated with self-strangulation/hangings (but not with all self-harm events). Overcrowding can impose destructive effects on the psychological and behavioral well being of inmates in prison, influencing a myriad of emotional and livelihood factors that predispose to harmful behavior. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This report should alert public health and prison authorities to this issue, and garner resources to address such an alarming rise. The findings from this short report demonstrate the need for a further examination of the mechanisms affecting self-harm among prisoners in this population, particularly the relationship between self-strangulations/hangings and overcrowding.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Ecological studies looking at such variables have identified a positive association between overcrowding and self-harm.80, 81”
From Risk factors for self-harm in prison: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as [81]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 19
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Swiss Federal Court (2015), “Conditions of detention at Champ-Dollon prison”, available at: www.bger.ch/press-news-1b_335_2013-t.pdf (accessed February 3, 2015).
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolff, H., Casillas, A., Perneger, T., Heller, P., Golay, D., Mouton, E., Bodenmann, P., & Getaz, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Geneva (CH)
- University of Lausanne (CH)
- Venue
- International Journal of Prisoner Health
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2016-03-14
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-44
- ISSN
- 1744-9200 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2268702247
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Prisoner Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IRIS (submittedVersion)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Restraint-Related Deaths
- Keywords
- self-harm, prison overcrowding, prisoners, pretrial detention, self-strangulation, resource competition, non-suicidal self-injury, suicidal behavior
- MeSH terms
- Cross-Sectional Studies, Crowding, Humans, Male, Prisoners, Prisons, Self Mutilation, Switzerland
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review