Cited by 19Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisRestraint-Related Deaths

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Self-harm and overcrowding among prisoners in Geneva, Switzerland

Open access
Wolff, Hans, Casillas, Alejandra, Perneger, Thomas, Heller, Patrick, Golay, Diane, Mouton, Elisabeth, Bodenmann, Patrick, Getaz, Laurent·2016·International Journal of Prisoner Health

Abstract

PURPOSE: Prison institutional conditions affect risk for self-harm among detainees. In particular, prison overcrowding may increase the likelihood of self-harm by creating competition for resources, space, and enhancing a "deprivation state." The purpose of this paper is to examine the association between overcrowding and prisoner acts of self-harm. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This cross-sectional study took place at Geneva's pre-trial prison (capacity:376) between 2006 and 2014. Outcomes were acts of self-harm that required medical attention, and self-strangulation/hanging events (combined into one group, as these are difficult to differentiate). Dichotomous predictors were overcrowding index- annual mean daily population divided by capacity ( > 200 percent vs < 200 percent), and year group (2006-2009 vs 2011-2014). FINDINGS: Self-harm and self-strangulations/hangings increased in 2011-2014 compared to 2006-2010 (p < 0.001). Overcrowding in excess of 200 percent was associated with self-strangulation/hangings (p < 0.001) but not with all self-harm events. In terms of pertinent demographics that would affect self-harm, there was no prison change in gender, area of origin, foreign residency, religion, or psychiatric treatment. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The present study is limited by the definition and identification of self-harm. The distinction between self-strangulation and self-hanging, and the precise classification of an intent to die is difficult to make in practice, especially with limited prison data records available. The relevant literature addresses the complexity of the association between non-suicidal and suicidal behavior. Despite this, the combined category self-strangulations/hangings gives some indication of severe self-harm events, especially since the methodology of categorization employed was consistent throughout the entire period of the study. Other limitations include the small sample size and the lack of individual patient data and prison data to help control for confounding factors. Despite these drawbacks, pertinent data (socio-demographics and number of prisoners treated for mental health and drug abuse) remained stable over the years. Thus, there are no apparent changes in the inmate population that could be linked to an increase in self-harm. High-security placements and mean prisoner stay have increased over time, with a decrease in staff to prisoner ratio - and these must be looked into further as contributors. Additionally, qualitative methods such as semi-structured interviews and focus groups could delineate the impact of overcrowding on prisoner well-being and self-harm potential. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The authors observed a significant increase in self-harm and self-strangulation/hangings over time, and overcrowding was significantly associated with self-strangulation/hangings (but not with all self-harm events). Overcrowding can impose destructive effects on the psychological and behavioral well being of inmates in prison, influencing a myriad of emotional and livelihood factors that predispose to harmful behavior. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This report should alert public health and prison authorities to this issue, and garner resources to address such an alarming rise. The findings from this short report demonstrate the need for a further examination of the mechanisms affecting self-harm among prisoners in this population, particularly the relationship between self-strangulations/hangings and overcrowding.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/ijph-04-2015-0009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 19

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Swiss Federal Court (2015), “Conditions of detention at Champ-Dollon prison”, available at: www.bger.ch/press-news-1b_335_2013-t.pdf (accessed February 3, 2015).

Metadata

Authors
Wolff, H., Casillas, A., Perneger, T., Heller, P., Golay, D., Mouton, E., Bodenmann, P., & Getaz, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • University of Lausanne (CH)
Venue
International Journal of Prisoner Health
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2016-03-14
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
39-44
ISSN
1744-9200 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2268702247
Cited by
19
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Prisoner Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Restraint-Related Deaths
Keywords
self-harm, prison overcrowding, prisoners, pretrial detention, self-strangulation, resource competition, non-suicidal self-injury, suicidal behavior
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Crowding, Humans, Male, Prisoners, Prisons, Self Mutilation, Switzerland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review