Reading and connecting: using social annotation in online classes
Open accessAbstract
Purpose The COVID-19 pandemic has forced many instructors to rapidly shift to online/distance teaching. With a narrow preparation window, many instructors are at a loss of strategies that are both effective in responding to the crisis and compatible with their professional practices. One urgent need in classrooms at all levels is to support social reading of course materials. To fulfill this need, this paper aims to present a systematic literature review on using Web annotation in K-12 and higher education to provide practical and evidence-based recommendations for educators to incorporate social annotation in online teaching. Design/methodology/approach This paper presents a systematic literature review of the use of Web annotation in formal education. The authors reviewed 39 articles that met the inclusion criteria and extracted the following information from each article: level of education, subject area, learning theory, learning activity design, Web annotation technology, research methods and learning outcomes. Studies were further analyzed and synthesized by the genre of learning activity design. Findings The authors identified five types of social annotation activity design: processing domain-specific knowledge, supporting argumentation and inquiry, improving literacy skills, supporting instructor and peer assessment and connecting online learning spaces. In addition, the authors developed practical recommendations on setting pedagogical goals, selecting annotation tools, deciding instructor involvement and developing evaluation strategies. Originality/value This study provides a timely response to online/distance teaching under the COVID-19 pandemic. It is a hope that these identified application areas, in combination with four practical recommendations, would provide pragmatic and evidence-based support for educators to engage learners in reading, learning and connecting.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The move to online learning was significant and sudden, but necessary to continue the learning process.
“Some studies [14-16] acknowledged that the move to online learning was significant and sudden, but that it was also necessary to continue the learning process.”
From Impact of online learning on student's performance and engagement: a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 102
- Authors
- Zhu, X., Chen, B., Avadhanam, R. M., Shui, H., & Zhang, R. Z.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Bodong
- Venue
- Information and Learning Sciences
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2020-06-25
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 5/6
- Pages
- 261-271
- ISSN
- 2398-5348 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3037274715
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10
- FWCI
- 22.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Information and Learning Sciences (publishedVersion)
- EdArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- EdArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
- Keywords
- social annotation, web annotation, online learning, distance education, COVID-19 pandemic, social reading, annotation tools, literacy skills, peer assessment, instructor involvement, learning activity design, K-12 education, higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review