Social media platforms and sleep problems: a systematic literature review, synthesis and framework for future research
Abstract
Purpose This study is a systematic literature review (SLR) on prior research examining the impact of the nocturnal use of social media platforms on a user's sleep, its dimensions and its perceptually allied problems. This SLR aims to curate, assimilate and critically examine the empirical research in this domain. Design/methodology/approach Forty-five relevant studies identified from the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases were analyzed to develop a comprehensive research profile, identify gaps in the current knowledge and delineate emergent research topics. Findings Prior research has narrowly focused on investigating the associations between specific aspects of social media use behavior and sleep dimensions. The findings suggest that previous studies are limited by research design and sampling issues. We highlight the imperative need to expand current research boundaries through a comprehensive framework that elucidates potential issues to be addressed in future research. Originality/value The findings have significant implications for clinicians, family members and educators concerning promoting appropriate social media use, especially during sleep latency.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two systematic reviews have assessed the relationship between social media use and sleep.
“To date, two systematic reviews have assessed the relationship between SMU and sleep (Alonzo et al., 2021; Kaur et al., 2021).”
From Social media use, mental health and sleep: A systematic review with meta-analyses (2024) · cites this paper as Kaur et al., 2021
Kaur et al. (2021) reviewed 45 studies and highlighted limitations of past research, particularly their narrow focus on social media use behaviours and sleep dimensions.
“Kaur et al. (2021) reviewed 45 studies and highlighted some limitations of the past research, particu larly their narrow focus on SMU behaviours and sleep dimensions.”
From Social media use, mental health and sleep: A systematic review with meta-analyses (2024) · cites this paper as Kaur et al., 2021
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 105 · Cited by 55
- Authors
- Kaur, P., Dhir, A., Alkhalifa, A. K., & Tandon, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Bergen (NO)
- University of Agder (NO)
- Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA)
- University of Turku (FI)
- Venue
- Internet Research
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2021-03-17
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1121-1152
- ISSN
- 1066-2243 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3137915467
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 105
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Internet Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
- Keywords
- social media use, sleep disorders, sleep latency, sleep quality, sleep disruption, research gaps, research framework
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review