Students' adoption of AI-based teacher-bots (T-bots) for learning in higher education
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate students' adoption intention (ADI) and actual usage (ATU) of artificial intelligence (AI)-based teacher bots (T-bots) for learning using technology adoption model (TAM) and context-specific variables. Design/methodology/approach A mixed-method design is used wherein the quantitative and qualitative approaches were used to explore the adoption of T-bots for learning. Overall, 45 principals/directors/deans/professors were interviewed and NVivo 8.0 was used for interview data analysis. Overall, 1,380 students of higher education institutes were surveyed, and the collected data was analyzed using the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) technique. Findings The T-bot's ADI’s antecedents found were perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, personalization, interactivity, perceived trust, anthropomorphism and perceived intelligence. The ADI influences the ATU of T-bots, and its relationship is negatively moderated by stickiness to learn from human teachers in the classroom. It comprehends the insights of senior authorities of the higher education institutions in India toward the adoption of T-bots. Practical implications The research provides distinctive insights for principals, directors and professors in higher education institutes to understand the factors affecting the students' behavioral intention and use of T-bots. The developers and designers of T-bots need to ensure that T-bots are more interacti…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 132 · Cited by 176
- Authors
- Pillai, R., Sivathanu, B., Metri, B., & Kaushik, N.
- Affiliations
- COEP Technological University (IN)
- Venue
- Information Technology & People
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2023-01-20
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 328-355
- ISSN
- 0959-3845 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4318219991
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 132
- Citations by year
- 2026: 57 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 10
- FWCI
- 41.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Information Technology and People (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Keywords
- technology adoption intention, university students, technology acceptance model, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, anthropomorphism, perceived trust, personalization, interactivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review