Cited by 51Cybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesSpam and Phishing DetectionCriminal Justice and Penology

The problem of “white noise”: examining current prevention approaches to online fraud

Open access
Cross, Cassandra, Kelly, Michael·2016·Journal of Financial Crime

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the current prevention messages that exist surrounding the prevention of online fraud. In particular, it focuses on the amount and level of detail that is promoted for each type of potential fraudulent approach. Design/methodology/approach: Multiple data sources are used to establish the main premise of this paper. This includes the publication entitled The Little Black Book of Scams , qualitative data from victims who have experienced online fraud, and materials collected through a police investigation into online fraud. Findings: Results of this analysis indicate that current prevention messages are characterised by a large degree of detail about the various ways that (online) fraud can be perpetrated. This is argued to be ineffective, based on the experiences of victims who were unable to apply their previous knowledge about fraud to their experiences. Additionally, the categorisation of fraudulent approaches is highlighted as unimportant to offenders, who are focused on obtaining money by whatever means (or approach) possible. Practical implications: This paper provides the impetus to evaluate the effectiveness of current prevention messages. It points to a simplification of existing prevention messages to focus more importantly on the transfer of money and the protection of personal information. Originality/value: This paper argues that current prevention messages are characterised by too much “white noise”, in that they focus on an overwhelming amount of detail. This is argued to obscure what should be a straightforward message which could have a greater impact than current messages.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jfc-12-2015-0069

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current prevention messaging against romance fraud focuses heavily on sending money directly to an offender.

    “Current prevention messaging is heavily focused on alerting people to an offender's request for money and is framed around instructions not to send money (Cross & Kelly, 2016).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 51

Authors
Cross, C., & Kelly, M.
Affiliations
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Venue
Journal of Financial Crime
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2016-10-03
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
806-818
ISSN
1359-0790 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2544438446
Cited by
51
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9
FWCI
11.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Financial Crime (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
online fraud, white noise, personal data protection, money transfer, police investigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review