Cited by 79Health Services Management and PolicyHealthcare cost, quality, practicesHealthcare Systems and Challenges

Tackling disinvestment in health care services: The views of resource allocators in the English NHS

Daniels, Tom, Williams, Iestyn, Robinson, Suzanne, Spence, Katie·2013·Journal of Health Organization and Management

Abstract

Purpose: – The aims of this paper are to explore the experiences of budget holders within the English National Health Service (NHS), in their attempts to implement programmes of disinvestment, and to consider factors which influence the success (or otherwise) of this activity. Design/methodology/approach: – Between 24 January and 15 March 2011 semi-structured, telephone interviews were conducted with representatives of 12 Primary Care Trusts in England. Interviews focussed on: understanding of the term “disinvestment”; current activities, and perceived determinants of successful disinvestment decision making and implementation. Data were organised into themes according to standard qualitative data coding practices. Findings: – Findings indicate that experiences of disinvestment are varied and that organisations are currently adopting a range of approaches. There are a number of apparently influential determinants of disinvestment which relate to both health system features and organisational characteristics. According to the experiences of the interviewees, many of the easier disinvestment options have now been taken and more ambitious plans, which require wider engagement and more thorough project management, will be required in the future. Research limitations/implications: – Findings from the research suggest that issues around understanding and usage of disinvestment terminology should be addressed and that a more in-depth and ethnographic research agenda will be of most value in moving forward both the theory and practice of disinvestment. Originality/value: – This research suggests that, in the English NHS at least, there is a disjuncture between common usage of the term “disinvestment” and the way that it has previously been understood by the wider research community. In addition to this, the research also highlights a broader range of potential determinants of disinvestment than are considered in the extant literature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jhom-11-2012-0225

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daniels, T., Williams, I., Robinson, S., & Spence, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Curtin University (AU)
Venue
Journal of Health Organization and Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2013-10-28
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
762-780
ISSN
1477-7266 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1585815739
Cited by
79
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health Organization and Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Institutional Research Archive (University of Birmingham) (acceptedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Services Management and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Challenges
Keywords
divestiture, primary care trusts, National Health Service, health care budgeting, decision-making, implementation, organizational characteristics, project management
MeSH terms
Budgets, England, Financing, Government, Hospitals, Public, Humans, State Medicine, Qualitative Research, Resource Allocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review