Cited by 180Ethics and Social Impacts of AIDigitalization, Law, and RegulationAI in Service Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Ethical and legal challenges of AI in marketing: an exploration of solutions

Open access
Kumar, Dinesh, Suthar, Nidhi·2024·Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society

Abstract

Purpose Artificial intelligence (AI) has sparked interest in various areas, including marketing. However, this exhilaration is being tempered by growing concerns about the moral and legal implications of using AI in marketing. Although previous research has revealed various ethical and legal issues, such as algorithmic discrimination and data privacy, there are no definitive answers. This paper aims to fill this gap by investigating AI’s ethical and legal concerns in marketing and suggesting feasible solutions. Design/methodology/approach The paper synthesises information from academic articles, industry reports, case studies and legal documents through a thematic literature review. A qualitative analysis approach categorises and interprets ethical and legal challenges and proposes potential solutions. Findings The findings of this paper raise concerns about ethical and legal challenges related to AI in the marketing area. Ethical concerns related to discrimination, bias, manipulation, job displacement, absence of social interaction, cybersecurity, unintended consequences, environmental impact, privacy and legal issues such as consumer security, responsibility, liability, brand protection, competition law, agreements, data protection, consumer protection and intellectual property rights are discussed in the paper, and their potential solutions are discussed. Research limitations/implications Notwithstanding the interesting insights gathered from this investigation of the ethi…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jices-05-2023-0068

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Facebook's advertising platform was found to skew the distribution of job and housing ads along gender and racial lines, even when advertisers did not intend to target by those attributes.

    “For instance, a well-documented case involved Facebook's advertising platform (now Meta): investigative journalists and researchers found that Facebook's algorithm for ad delivery was skewing the distribution of job and housing ads along gender and racial lines, even when advertisers did not intend to target by those attributes (Kopalle, 2022;Kumar, V., 2024;Khan, 2024;Kumar, R., 2024).”
  • Ads for high-paying jobs in tech were shown far more to men than women; housing ads in certain neighborhoods were shown preferentially to white users over minority users.

    “Ads for high-paying jobs in tech were shown far more to men than women; housing ads in certain neighborhoods were shown preferentially to white users over minority users.”

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 61 · Cited by 180

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. 2022, Special issue on cybersecurity management in the era of AI, Journal of Network and Systems Management, 30, 39, 10.1007/s10922-022-09659-3 · DOI
  2. 2016, The evolution of Fintech: a new post-crisis paradigm?, Georgetown Journal of International Law, 47, 1271
  3. 2021, Emerging challenges in AI and the need for AI ethics education, AI and Ethics, 1, 61, 10.1007/s43681-020-00002-7 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 2006, Ethical leadership: a review and future directions, The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004 von · DOI · Paper page
  5. 2017, Of, for, and by the people: the legal lacuna of synthetic personas, AI and Society, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 25, 273, 10.1007/s00146-016-0667-3 · DOI
  6. 2018, Where machines could replace humans – and where they can’t (yet), McKinsey Quarterly, 1, 1
  7. 2009, Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion, 339
  8. 2014, Big data and due process: toward a framework to redress predictive privacy harms, Boston College Law Review, 55, 93
  9. 2021, Ethical and legal challenges of artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine, Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, 51, 120, 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2020.08.001 · DOI
  10. 2020, Improving fake product detection using ai‐based technology
  11. 2022, Federated learning for privacy-preserving: a review of PII data analysis in Fintech, International Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 13
  12. 2018, Artificial intelligence for the real world, Harvard Business Review, 96, 108
  13. 2019, Artificial intelligence in marketing: a general overview and future research directions, Journal of Business Research, 98, 365, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.014 · DOI
  14. European Commission, 2021, White Paper on Artificial Intelligence: A European Approach to Excellence and Trust
  15. 2021, An ethical framework for a good AI society: opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations, 19
  16. 2020, Ethical and legal challenges of artificial intelligence-driven healthcare, 295, 10.1016/B978-0-12-818438-7.00012-5 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 2018, Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media
  18. 2017, Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). Defense advanced research projects agency (DARPA), nd Web, 2, 1
  19. 2015, Consumer protection in the age of big data, 859
  20. 2021, Intellectual property rights in the age of artificial intelligence, Issue 2 Int'l JL Mgmt. and Human, 1501, 4
  21. 2018, Artificial intelligence and consumer privacy, 439
  22. 2017, Machine learning with personal data
  23. 2021, Ai and shared prosperity, 645, 10.1145/3461702.3462619 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 2013, Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behaviour, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 5802, 10.1073/pnas.1218772110 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 2021, Economics of artificial intelligence in cybersecurity, IT Professional, 23, 73, 10.1109/MITP.2021.3100177 · DOI
  26. 1999, Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace
  27. 2015, Online recommendation systems in a B2C e-commerce context: a review and future directions, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 72, 10.17705/1jais.00389 · DOI
  28. 2023, Counting carbon: a survey of factors influencing the emissions of machine learning
  29. 2016, Like having a really bad PA: the Gulf between user expectation and experience of conversational agents, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 23, 1
  30. 2019, Explaining explanations in AI, 279, 10.1145/3287560.3287574 · DOI · Paper page
  31. OECD, 2019, Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data
  32. 1998, Computational Intelligence: A Logical Approach
  33. 2018, Foresight of cyber security threat drivers and affecting technologies, foresight, 20, 353, 10.1108/FS-02-2018-0020 · DOI
  34. 2023, From ChatGPT to HackGPT: meeting the cybersecurity threat of generative AI, MIT Sloan Management Review
  35. 2010, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach
  36. 2011, Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation, 39, 10.1007/978-3-531-93468-6_2 · DOI
  37. 2015, Ethical IT Innovation: A Value-Based System Design Approach
  38. 2019, Trusting artificial intelligence in cybersecurity is a double-edged sword, Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 557, 10.1038/s42256-019-0109-1 · DOI
  39. 2019, Deep Medicine: How Artificial Intelligence Can Make Healthcare Human Again
  40. 2019, Does the GDPR enhance consumers’ control over personal data? An analysis from a behavioural perspective, Journal of Consumer Policy, 42, 91, 10.1007/s10603-018-9399-7 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 2023, Corporate digital responsibility: dealing with ethical, privacy and fairness challenges of AI, Journal of Business Research
  42. 2016, The trouble with algorithmic decisions: an analytic road map to examine efficiency and fairness in automated and opaque decision making, Science, Technology, and Human Values, 41, 118, 10.1177/0162243915605575 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 2018, Mitigating unwanted biases with adversarial learning, 335, 10.1145/3278721.3278779 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 2017, An overview of blockchain technology: architecture, consensus, and future trends, 557, 10.1109/BigDataCongress.2017.85 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 2017, Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases, Science, 356, 183, 10.1126/science.aal4230 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 2022, Ethical, legal, and social considerations of AI-based medical decision-support tools: a scoping review, International Journal of Medical Informatics, 161, 104738, 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104738 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 2021, AI and law: ethical, legal, and socio-political implications, AI and Society, 36, 403, 10.1007/s00146-021-01194-0 · DOI
  48. 2020, Algorithmic content moderation: technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance, Big Data and Society, 7, 2053951719897945
  49. 2018, Human decisions and machine predictions, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133, 237, 10.1093/qje/qjx032 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 2020, Deep learning face attributes in the wild, 3730, 10.1109/ICCV.2015.425 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 2019, RoBERTa: a robustly optimised BERT pretraining approach

Metadata

Authors
Kumar, D., & Suthar, N.
Affiliations
Lovely Professional University (IN)
Corresponding author
Kumar, Dinesh
Venue
Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2024-01-22
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
124-144
ISSN
1477-996X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391040815
Cited by
180
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 78 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 32
FWCI
73.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
artificial intelligence in marketing, AI ethics, AI regulation, algorithmic discrimination, data privacy, targeted advertising, consumer protection, intellectual property, competition law, cybersecurity, job displacement, transparency and explainability, consumer trust, algorithmic bias, brand protection, environmental impact of AI, data protection, consumer manipulation, unintended consequences of AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review