Barriers and facilitators to adoption of e-learning in higher education institutions of Pakistan during COVID-19: perspectives from an emerging economy
Abstract
Purpose Integrating e-learning into higher education institutions (HEIs) is a complex process. Several universities had tried to impart learning online, especially amid the spread of COVID-19. However, they failed miserably due to the many barriers to online learning platforms’ delivery and acceptance. This study aims to explore the barriers and facilitators in adopting e-learning in HEIs of Pakistan by taking the perspective of key stakeholders involved in the management and administration of HEIs. Design/methodology/approach The authors recruited participants using purposive and snowball sampling. Interviews were conducted from a variety of participants, including academicians, administrators and information technology (IT) personnel. Data recorded was transcribed into verbatim and then analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings The analysis identified barriers and facilitators to the e-learning implementation. Barriers included lack of resources and training, lack of infrastructure, inadequate e-learning policies, absence of positive mindset among teachers and students and reservations and concerns about e-learning of parents and teachers. By contrast, facilitators included prior training and awareness (provided by HEIs regarding e-learning), the assistance of government and regulatory bodies (in terms of policy and training on e-learning), the role of IT (in development and implementation of online learning system) and good computer knowledge and skills of students and fa…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pakistani challenges such as adoption resistance, insufficient professional training, and a policy-practice gap mirror wider educational technology findings.
“In Pakistan, challenges such as resistance to adoption, lack of professional training, and a gap between policy and practice reflect the broader issues identified in educational technology research (Qazi, Sharif et al. 2024).”
From AI Adoption in Higher Education: A Comparative Study of Institutional Readiness and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as Qazi, Sharif et al. 2024
Cites
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y · Cited by 12,038 · see citing works
Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research
Mays, N. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50 · Cited by 3,742 · see citing works
Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54 · Cited by 3,480 · see citing works
Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?
Barbour, R. S. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115 · Cited by 2,613 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
AI Adoption in Higher Education: A Comparative Study of Institutional Readiness and Challenges
Huma, T., Ahmed, D. S., Mahmood, W., khan, D. A., & Afridi, D. A. K. (2025) · Social Science Review Archives · doi:10.70670/sra.v3i4.1117 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Qazi, M. A., Sharif, M. A., & Akhlaq, A.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Business Management (PK)
- Venue
- Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2022-07-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-52
- ISSN
- 2053-4620 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4284961661
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 22.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Technology
- Social Sciences › Education › E-Learning and COVID-19
- Keywords
- e-learning adoption, barriers and facilitators, higher education institutions, COVID-19 pandemic, online learning, Pakistan, emerging markets, e-learning policy, faculty training, IT infrastructure, stakeholder perspectives, health emergencies, government support for education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review