Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intersection of generative artificial intelligence and copyright: an Indian perspective

Vig, Shinu·2026·Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management
DOI 10.1108/jstpm-08-2023-0145
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose: The main objective of this study is to present a compact overview analysis of intellectual property laws, specifically copyright-related provisions applicable to generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in the Indian context. Design/methodology/approach: The paper adopts a qualitative research methodology that is grounded in secondary sources of information. The data were gathered from the Scopus database for a systematic literature review. Findings: GenAI technology has given rise to numerous questionable issues within the domain of intellectual property that need resolution in the form of policy solutions. Based on the findings of this paper, it can be deduced that Indian copyright laws are not adequate for addressing the rights pertaining to AI and its creations and outputs. Different countries like the United States, European Union and China have approached the regulation and protection of AI-generated content within the realm of copyright law in different ways. The future of law, as it has been established thus far, seems to be on a path of substantial evolution. Practical implications: The study has implications for policymakers globally as there is a need to create feasible policy solutions that can efficiently safeguard against risks stemming from large language models (LLMs) and other GenAI models, while also promoting innovation, technical advancement and adoption. Originality/value: The paper discusses the copyright-related issues in GenAI technology in the context of an emerging economy, India.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jstpm-08-2023-0145

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Dwivedi, 2023, So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy, International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ekhator, 2023, An examination of copyright issues associated with autonomous AI machines, 10.2139/ssrn.4416232 · DOI
  3. Kar, 2023, Unravelling the impact of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in industrial applications: a review of scientific and grey literature, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24, 659, 10.1007/s40171-023-00356-x · DOI
  4. Kretschmer, 2024, Copyright law and the lifecycle of machine learning models, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 55, 1
  5. Laukyte, 2012, Artificial and autonomous: a person?
  6. Lucchi, 2023, ChatGPT: a case study on copyright challenges for generative artificial intelligence systems, European Journal of Risk Regulation, 1
  7. Luk, 2024, The relationship between law and technology: comparing legal responses to creators’ rights under copyright law through safe harbour for online intermediaries and generative AI technology, Law, Innovation and Technology, 16, 1, 10.1080/17579961.2024.2313800 · DOI
  8. Mammen, 2020, AI and IP: are creativity and inventorship inherently human activities?, FIU L. Rev, 14, 275, 10.25148/lawrev.14.2.9 · DOI
  9. Parris, 2013, A systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts, Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 377, 10.1007/s10551-012-1322-6 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Peres, 2023, On ChatGPT and beyond: how generative artificial intelligence may affect research, teaching, and practice, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 40, 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Potter, W. (2023), “The conversation. Available at if ChatGPT wrote it, who owns the copyright? It depends on where you live, but in Australia it's complicated”, available at:theconversation.com · DOI
  12. Presuel, 2024, Imitadores estadísticos: La cuestión de la autoría y la inteligencia artificial generativa. Una visión comparada entre el derecho de autor de EE. UU. y de la unión Europea. (statistical mimics: authorship and generative artificial intelligence. A comparative vision between American and European union copyright laws.), Inteligencia Artificial, 27, 14, 10.4114/intartif.vol27iss73pp14-37 · DOI
  13. Qadir, 2023, Engineering education in the era of ChatGPT: promise and pitfalls of GenAI for education, 1, 10.1109/EDUCON54358.2023.10125121 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Rajya Sabha (2021), “Review of the Intellectual Property Rights Regime in India”, Parliament of India, Rajya Sabha, Report No. 161, Department related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Commerce, at 29.
  15. Shi, 2023, Study on security risks and legal regulations of generative artificial intelligence, Science of Law Journal, 2, 17
  16. Strowel, 2023, ChatGPT and GenAI tools: theft of intellectual labor?, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 54, 1
  17. Vaswani, 2017, Attention is all you need, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30
  18. Vig, 2022, Intellectual property rights and the metaverse: an Indian perspective, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 25, 753, 10.1111/jwip.12249 · DOI
  19. Khanna, M. (2022), “Comic book made by AI loses copyright protection”, INDIA TIMES (Dec. 28, 2022, 03:39 PM), available at:www.indiatimes.com/technology/news/comic-book-made-by-ai-loses-copyright-protection-588388.html

Cited by

See all 8

Metadata

Authors
Vig, S.
Affiliations
Noida, Symbiosis International (Deemed University) Symbiosis Centre for Management Studies, , Pune,
Venue
Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2024-07-09
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
118-133
ISSN
  • 2053-4620
  • 2053-4639
DOI
10.1108/jstpm-08-2023-0145
Cited by
8
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intersection of generative artificial intelligence and copyright: an Indian perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/jstpm-08-2023-0145
The paper
Vig, S. (2026). Intersection of generative artificial intelligence and copyright: an Indian perspective. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/jstpm-08-2023-0145