The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Airbnb: the future of networked hospitality businesses
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Although networked hospitality businesses as Airbnb are a recent phenomenon, a rapid growth has made them a serious competitor for the hospitality industry with important consequences for tourism and for tourist destinations. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the nature of the phenomenon, its potential further development in the next five years and the impact this developments will have on tourism, on hotels and on city destinations. Design/methodology/approach: A literature study, combined with scenario workshops and a Delphi panel, were used to map current trends and uncertainties. With this input, future scenarios were elaborated using the Global Business Network (“scenario cross”) method. Findings: Network platforms as Airbnb are often classified under something called the “Sharing Economy”, a denomination that obscures their true nature. Airbnb is a challenging innovation to which traditional hospitality will have to respond. Its impact has at the same time led to a call for regulatory policies. The definition of these policies and the evolution of tourism are variables that determine future scenarios. Attempts to ban the phenomenon mean a disincentive to innovation and protect oligopolistic markets; more receptive policies may have the desired results if tourism grows moderately but in booming destinations they may lead to a harmful commercialization. Originality/value: Until now, Airbnb has been described in conceptual studies about the so-called “Sharing economy”, or more recently in empirical studies about isolated effects of holiday rentals. This paper contextualizes the evolution of networked hospitality and seeks to synthesize the sum of its impacts, thus enabling businesses and local governments to define positions and strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Co‐creating unique value with customers
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004) · Strategy & Leadership · doi:10.1108/10878570410699249 · Cited by 2,463
The Rise of the Sharing Economy: Estimating the Impact of Airbnb on the Hotel Industry
Zervas, G., Proserpio, D., & Byers, J. W. (2017) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.15.0204 · Cited by 2,376 · cited 6×
“This may lead to the displacement of residents and an increase in rental costs, as has been noted in New York and San Francisco (New York State Attorney General, 2014; Zervas et al., 2014; Sabatini, 2015).”
BackgroundResultInfluential
Cited by
Min, S., So, K. K. F., & Jeong, M. (2019) · Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · doi:10.1080/10548408.2018.1507866 · Cited by 489
The accommodation experiencescape: a comparative assessment of hotels and Airbnb
Mody, M. A., Suess, C., & Lehto, X. (2017) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-09-2016-0501 · Cited by 379
Priporas, C.-V., Stylos, N., Rahimi, R., & Vedanthachari, L. N. (2017) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-08-2016-0420 · Cited by 228
Airbnb as an instigator of ‘tourism bubble’ expansion in Utrecht's Lombok neighbourhood
Ioannides, D., Röslmaier, M., & van der Zee, E. (2019) · Tourism Geographies · doi:10.1080/14616688.2018.1454505 · Cited by 227
Metadata
- Authors
- Oskam, J., & Boswijk, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Tourism Futures
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2016-03-14
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 22-42
- ISSN
- 2055-5911 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2300200629
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 122.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.