Cited by 26Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareOrganizational Leadership and Management Strategies

Compassionate leadership in palliative and end-of-life care: a focus group study

Open access
Hewison, Alistair, Sawbridge, Yvonne, Tooley, Laura·2019·Leadership in Health Services

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore compassionate leadership with those involved in leading system-wide end-of-life care. Its purpose was to: define compassionate leadership in the context of palliative and end-of-life care; collect accounts of compassionate leadership activity from key stakeholders in end-of-life and palliative care; and identify examples of compassionate leadership in practice. Design/methodology/approach: Four focus groups involving staff from a range of healthcare organisations including hospitals, hospices and community teams were conducted to access the accounts of staff leading palliative and end-of-life care. The data were analysed thematically. Findings: The themes that emerged from the data included: the importance of leadership as role modelling and nurturing; how stories were used to explain approaches to leading end-of-life care; the nature of leadership as challenging existing practice; and a requirement for leaders to manage boundaries effectively. Rich and detailed examples of leadership in action were shared. Research limitations/implications: The findings indicate that a relational approach to leadership was enacted in a range of palliative and end-of-life care settings. Practical implications: Context-specific action learning may be a means of further developing compassionate leadership capability in palliative and end-of-life care and more widely in healthcare settings. Originality/value: This paper presents data indicating how compassionate leadership, as a form of activity, is envisaged and enacted by staff in healthcare.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/lhs-09-2018-0044

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 26

Authors
Hewison, A., Sawbridge, Y., & Tooley, L.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Venue
Leadership in Health Services
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2019-05-07
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
264-279
ISSN
  • 1366-0756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-1879
OpenAlex
W2925336930
Cited by
26
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Leadership in health services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies
Keywords
compassionate leadership, palliative care, end-of-life care, healthcare leadership, role modeling, relational leadership, boundary management, action learning, staff perspectives, hospice, hospitals
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Empathy, Humans, Leadership, Palliative Care, Terminal Care, Focus Groups, Professional Role

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review