CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 9Library Science and InformationLibrary Science and Information LiteracyInformation Science and Libraries

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Specialties and strategies in academic libraries: a cluster analysis approach

Koizumi, Masanori, Widdersheim, Michael Majewski·2019·Library Management
DOI 10.1108/lm-10-2017-0114
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose Professional work is becoming more specialized and diffused, with new specialties emerging on the boundaries of established professions. The purpose of this paper is to examine current specialties in academic librarianship in order to infer what strategies they employ. Design/methodology/approach This research uses a sample of 60 US research libraries to investigate current specialties in academic librarianship, in order to analyze and classify the specialties into groups based on similarities, and categorize academic libraries based on the staffing patterns identified, and illustrate the challenges and strategies of each classification. The sample was selected from the membership of the Association of Research Libraries, and designed to include both large and medium-sized research libraries. 888 different job titles were identified for 2,074 specialist positions extracted from staff directories containing information on 11,688 librarians. The positions were analyzed and classified using the framework provided by Cox and Corrall (2013), and the specialty composition of the libraries was investigated with Ward’s (1963) hierarchical method of cluster analysis, using 28 variables. Findings The cluster analysis identified subspecialties within the groups and revealed seven distinct staffing strategies of the libraries. Originality/value Describing specialties and strategies in academic libraries by cluster analysis based on huge data is a significantly novel and effective…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/lm-10-2017-0114

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 1988, The System of Professions
  2. 1998, Professionalism and the future of librarianship, Library Trends, 46, 430
  3. 2014, Establishing a new clinical informationist role in an academic health sciences center, Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 33, 136, 10.1080/02763869.2014.897511 · DOI
  4. ARL, 2013, Rank Order Table 11: Total Staff (FTE). In ARL Statistics 2011–2012
  5. 2014, ARL cataloger librarian roles and responsibilities now and in the future, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 52, 229, 10.1080/01639374.2013.859199 · DOI
  6. 2013, Expanding the role of technical services librarians in community outreach: a successful program in achieving synergy, Technical Services Quarterly, 30, 372, 10.1080/07317131.2013.818500 · DOI
  7. 1993, A strategic planning imperative: the Penn State experience, Journal of Library Administration, 18, 201
  8. 2014, Designing libraries for research collaboration in the network world: an exploratory study, LIBER Quarterly, 24, 17, 10.18352/lq.9525 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 2012, New Roles for New Times: Research Library Services for Graduate Students
  10. 2013, Evolving academic library specialities, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 1526, 10.1002/asi.22847 · DOI
  11. 2011, Cluster Analysis
  12. 2014, Supporting the next-generation ILS: the changing roles of systems librarians, Journal of Library Innovation, 5, 30
  13. 2014, Facilitating communities of practice in digital humanities: librarian collaborations for research and training in text encoding, The Library Quarterly, 84, 219, 10.1086/675332 · DOI
  14. 2014, NASIG’s core competencies for electronic resources librarians revisited: an analysis of job advertisement trends, 2000–2012, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40, 247
  15. 2013, Competencies required for digital curation: an analysis of Job advertisements, International Journal of Digital Curation, 8, 66, 10.2218/ijdc.v8i1.242 · DOI
  16. 2017, Inherent Strategies in Library Management
  17. 2014, New and emerging roles for medical librarians, Journal of Hospital Librarianship, 14, 24, 10.1080/15323269.2014.859995 · DOI
  18. 1982, Strategies for Library Administration: Concepts and Approaches
  19. 2013, Adapting to change: a survey of evolving job descriptions in medical librarianship, Journal of Hospital Librarianship, 13, 246, 10.1080/15323269.2013.798772 · DOI
  20. 1993, A strategic planning process for the multi-campus university system: The role of one campus and library, Journal of Library Administration, 18, 181
  21. 2013, Highlighting the informationist as a data librarian embedded in a research team, Journal of eScience Librarianship, 2, 1, 10.7191/jeslib.2013.1044 · DOI
  22. 2013, Exploring librarian roles in support of one health, Journal of Agricultural & Food Information, 14, 321, 10.1080/10496505.2013.826582 · DOI
  23. 2003, From library systems to mainstream software: how web technologies are changing the role of systems librarian, Library Hi Tech, 21, 289, 10.1108/07378830310494463 · DOI
  24. 2003, The status of systems librarians, Library Hi Tech, 21, 267, 10.1108/07378830310494427 · DOI
  25. 2013, Expert searcher, teacher, content manager, and patient advocate: an exploratory study of clinical librarian roles, Journal of the Medical Library Association, 101, 63, 10.3163/1536-5050.101.1.010 · DOI
  26. 2014, Research data management services in academic research libraries and perceptions of librarians, Library & Information Science Research, 36, 84, 10.1016/j.lisr.2013.11.003 · DOI
  27. 1963, Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236, 10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845 · DOI
  28. 2014, Competences and responsibilities of social science data librarians: an analysis of job descriptions, College and Research Libraries, 75, 362, 10.5860/crl13-435 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
Koizumi, M., & Widdersheim, M. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Tsukuba (JP)
  • Emporia State University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Library Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2019-01-14
Volume
40
Issue
1/2
Pages
45-58
ISSN
0143-5124 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/lm-10-2017-0114
OpenAlex
W2885817918
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
Locations
Library Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Information Science and Libraries
Keywords
academic librarianship, professional specialization, research libraries, job titles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specialties and strategies in academic libraries: a cluster analysis approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/lm-10-2017-0114
The paper
Koizumi, M., & Widdersheim, M. M. (2019). Specialties and strategies in academic libraries: a cluster analysis approach. Library Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/lm-10-2017-0114