The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Library spaces in the 21st century: Meeting the challenges of user needs for information, technology, and expertise
Abstract
Purpose – Libraries and library professionals face multiple challenges in meeting user needs in the second decade of the new millennium. This is particularly true in academic libraries where students and faculty demand and expect fast, easy, and seamless access to information as well as flexible, comfortable places to work alone as well as collaboratively with colleagues, friends, classmates, and instructors. These same patrons often require the assistance of information specialists to navigate a library’s increasingly large array of online resources. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – This paper provides historical context and reviews recent trends in the area in the area of learning and study spaces in academic libraries. It also cites the successful information commons at the author’s home institution, Loyola University Chicago, examining its first six years of operation and projecting changes in its next half decade. Findings – The past 15 plus years have seen a major shift in philosophy in the USA and in other parts of the globe in terms of the importance of “library as space” in enhancing the role of the college and university library. As a result, academic institutions, at the urging of librarians, have created spaces known as information commons, learning commons, research commons, etc. in response to user needs for access to technology, group work, social interaction, and knowledge creation. Originality/value – The information commo…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Beagle, D. (1999), “Conceptualizing an information commons”, The Journal of Academic Librarianship , Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 82-89. · DOI · Paper page
- Beagle, D. (2010),“The emergent information commons: philosophy, models, and 21st century learning paradigms”, The Journal of Library Administration , Vol. 50, pp. 9-10, 17.
- Halbert, M. (2010), “The information commons: a platform for innovation”, The Journal of Library Administration , Vol. 50, pp. 67-74. · DOI
- Lippincott, J.K. (2010), “Information commons: meeting millennials’ needs”, The Journal of Library Administration , Vol. 50, pp. 27-37. · DOI
- Metcalf, K.D. (1965), Planning Academic and Research Library Buildings , McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, p. 6.
- Sullivan, R. (2010), “Common knowledge: learning spaces in academic libraries”, College and Undergraduate Libraries , Vol. 17 Nos 2-3, pp. 130-148. · DOI
- USC opens $27.5M Leavey Library (1994), College & Research Libraries News , Vol. 55 No. 10, p. 629.
Cited by
Connector, Catalyst and Common Good: Defining the Academic Library of the 21st Century
Jaguszewski, J., & McGuire, L. A. (2018) · Library Leadership & Management · doi:10.5860/llm.v32i2.7227 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Seal, R. A.
- Affiliations
- Loyola University Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Seal, Robert A
- Venue
- Library Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2015-11-09
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 8/9
- Pages
- 558-569
- ISSN
- 0143-5124 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2194898077
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 37.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Library Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Web and Library Services
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
- Keywords
- library space, academic libraries, information commons, learning commons, research commons, user needs, collaborative learning environments, access to information, library history, Loyola University Chicago
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review