Exploring the relationship between leader narcissism and team creativity: Evidence from R&D teams in Chinese high-technology enterprises
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the mediating effect of information search effort on the relationship between leader narcissism and team creativity in China based on attention theory. The paper also explores participative decision making as a moderator in the relationship between team leader narcissism and information search effort. Design/methodology/approach Through a survey of 667 team members and their team leaders from 96 research and development teams at 23 high-tech enterprises in China with paired samples, cross-time data were collected. Confirmatory factor analysis, hierarchical regression and path analysis were adopted to analyze the data. Findings This paper found that leader narcissism had a positive impact on team information search effort, thereby promoting team creativity, and the effect of leader narcissism on team information search effort is more positive in the context of high participation in decision making. Practical implications Narcissism should be a noteworthy trait in manager selection and promotion especially for the departments and teams which focus on innovation and creation. And companies should pay attention to the team work processes to ensure that team members have the opportunity to participate in decision making for promoting the team leader’s narcissistic “bright” side in the institutional environment and avoiding the “dark” side. Originality/value This paper discusses how and when leader narcissism influences team creat…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Narcissistic leaders positively affect turnover intention and negatively impact performance.
“Previous works disclosed that narsisitic leaders positively effected turnover intention [39–41], negatively impacted performance [2, 42, 43].”
From Narcissistic leadership, workplace bullying, turnover intention, and creative performance: a study of nurses (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 64 · Cited by 27
- Authors
- Zhou, L., Li, J., Liu, Y., Tian, F., Zhang, X., & Qin, W.
- Affiliations
- Southeast University (CN)
- Nanjing Normal University (CN)
- Jiangnan University (CN)
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
- Nanjing University of Finance and Economics (CN)
- Venue
- Leadership & Organization Development Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2019-11-04
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 916-931
- ISSN
- 0143-7739 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2991009571
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 2.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Leadership & Organization Development Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Keywords
- leader narcissism, team creativity, attention theory, participative decision-making, R&D teams, high-tech enterprises, Chinese organizations, innovation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review