Cited by 27Team Dynamics and PerformancePersonality Traits and PsychologyJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Exploring the relationship between leader narcissism and team creativity: Evidence from R&D teams in Chinese high-technology enterprises

Zhou, Lulu, Li, Jin, Liu, Yan, Tian, Feng, Zhang, Xufan, Qin, Weiping·2019·Leadership & Organization Development Journal

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the mediating effect of information search effort on the relationship between leader narcissism and team creativity in China based on attention theory. The paper also explores participative decision making as a moderator in the relationship between team leader narcissism and information search effort. Design/methodology/approach Through a survey of 667 team members and their team leaders from 96 research and development teams at 23 high-tech enterprises in China with paired samples, cross-time data were collected. Confirmatory factor analysis, hierarchical regression and path analysis were adopted to analyze the data. Findings This paper found that leader narcissism had a positive impact on team information search effort, thereby promoting team creativity, and the effect of leader narcissism on team information search effort is more positive in the context of high participation in decision making. Practical implications Narcissism should be a noteworthy trait in manager selection and promotion especially for the departments and teams which focus on innovation and creation. And companies should pay attention to the team work processes to ensure that team members have the opportunity to participate in decision making for promoting the team leader’s narcissistic “bright” side in the institutional environment and avoiding the “dark” side. Originality/value This paper discusses how and when leader narcissism influences team creat…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/lodj-03-2019-0099

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 64 · Cited by 27

Authors
Zhou, L., Li, J., Liu, Y., Tian, F., Zhang, X., & Qin, W.
Affiliations
  • Southeast University (CN)
  • Nanjing Normal University (CN)
  • Jiangnan University (CN)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • Nanjing University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Venue
Leadership & Organization Development Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2019-11-04
Volume
40
Issue
8
Pages
916-931
ISSN
0143-7739 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2991009571
Cited by
27
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Leadership & Organization Development Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
leader narcissism, team creativity, attention theory, participative decision-making, R&D teams, high-tech enterprises, Chinese organizations, innovation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review