The relation between entrepreneurship and rural poverty alleviation in China
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: There is a recent growing interest to find a lasting intervention to rural poverty (RP) in developing countries based on farmer entrepreneurship and innovation. The purpose of this paper, therefore, is to examine the relation between entrepreneurship and RP alleviation in two resource-constrained provinces of China. This paper assesses the influence of three capabilities of farm entrepreneurs – educational, economic and socio-cultural – on farmer entrepreneurship growth and how these, in turn, impact alleviation of RP. Design/methodology/approach: Household survey data comprising 363 respondents were taken from four deprived communities in two provinces of China. The paper employed structural equation modeling (SEM), using AMOS 21.0 alongside SPSS 20.0 to test the relations between the constructs. Findings: The results show that a statistically significant and positive relation exists between entrepreneurship and RP alleviation in China. The findings of the study further reveal that qualitative growth of entrepreneurship has a stronger positive influence on RP alleviation than on quantitative growth, and socio-cultural capabilities of respondents significantly and positively affect entrepreneurial growth of farmers, rather than education and economic capabilities. Research limitations/implications: The use of data from four communities in two provinces tends to limit the ability to generalize the findings of the study. Furthermore, the survey did not collect information on non-farm entrepreneurs, making it impossible to compare the findings from farm entrepreneurs with non-farm entrepreneurs. Practical implications: The findings have practical implications for policy makers in rural China toward addressing targeted RP. This paper, therefore, suggests that entrepreneurship should be pursued vigorously among farmers in rural areas of China to help solve poverty. The paper also presents a useful lesson for various stakeholders in poverty alleviation programs in other developing countries. Originality/value: This paper contributes to the academic literature on the entrepreneurship–RP alleviation nexus by combining the theory of capability and SEM in the analysis of an emerging economy such as China.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A study by Naminse et al. (2019) provides evidence that the feminization of the agribusiness sector in China is improving in helping to tackle youth unemployment.
“However, a study by Naminse et al., (2019) provides evidence that the feminization of the agribusiness sector in China is improving in helping to tackle youth unemployment.”
From The effects of uppercase vs. lowercase letters on consumers’ perceptions and brand attitudes (2021) · cites this paper as Naminse et al., (2019)
Cites
Dhahri, S., & Omri, A. (2018) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.01.008 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
Baron, R. A., Mueller, B. A., & Wolfe, M. T. (2016) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.08.002 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teng, L., Xie, C., Liu, T., Wang, F., & Foti, L. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.037 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Naminse, E. Y., Zhuang, J., & Zhu, F.
- Affiliations
- Beibu Gulf University (CN)
- Jiangsu University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Naminse, Eric Yaw
- ORCID
- Naminse, Eric Yaw
- Venue
- Management Decision
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2019-10-15
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2593-2611
- ISSN
- 0025-1747 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2903553497
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 7.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Management Decision (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Development and Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Keywords
- farmer entrepreneurship, rural poverty alleviation, entrepreneurial capabilities, economic capacity, anti-poverty policy, rural China
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review