Cited by 23Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Service user experiences of mentalisation-based treatment for borderline personality disorder.

Open access
Lonargáin, Diarmaid Ó., Hodge, Suzanne, Line, Rachael·2017·Mental Health Review Journal

Abstract

Purpose Previous research indicates that mentalisation-based treatment (MBT) is an effective therapeutic programme for difficulties associated with borderline personality disorder (BPD). The purpose of this paper is to explore service user experiences of the therapy. Design/methodology/approach Seven adults (five female and two male), recruited via three NHS trusts, were interviewed. Participants were attending intensive out-patient MBT for BPD between 3 and 14 months. Data were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Findings Participants experienced the group component of MBT as challenging and unpredictable. They highlighted developing trust as key to benefitting from MBT. This was much more difficult to achieve in group sessions than in individual therapy, particularly for those attending MBT for less than five or six months. The structure of MBT generally worked well for participants but they identified individual therapy as the core component in achieving change. All participants learned to view the world more positively due to MBT. Practical implications Enhanced mentalisation capacity may help address specific challenges associated with BPD, namely, impulsivity and interpersonal difficulties. MBT therapists are confronted with the ongoing task of creating a balance between sufficient safety and adequate challenge during MBT. Potential benefits and drawbacks of differing structural arrangements of MBT programmes within the UK are considered. Originality/value Learning about service user perspectives has facilitated an enhanced understanding of experiences of change during MBT in addition to specific factors that may impact mentalisation capacity throughout the programme. These factors, in addition to implications for MBT and suggestions for future research, are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/mhrj-04-2016-0008

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A majority of the existing first-person studies focus on how persons diagnosed with BPD experience specific intervention strategies, such as music therapy, specific group therapy, and MBT.

    “However, a majority of the existing studies focus on how persons diagnosed with BPD experience specific intervention strategies, such as music therapy (Strehlow and Lindner, 2016), specific group therapy (Sagen Inderhaug and Karterud, 2015), and MBT (Lonargáin et al., 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 23

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Allen, J. G., Fonagy, P. and Bateman, A. (2008), Mentalizing in Clinical Practice (1 st ed.), American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc., Arlington, VA, London.
  2. Bateman, A. W. and Fonagy, P. (Eds.), Handbook of Mentalizing in Mental Health Practice, American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc., Washington, DC, London, pp. 67-80.
  3. Bowlby, J. (1973), Attachment and Loss: Vol. 2, Separation Anxiety and Anger, Basic Books, New York.
  4. Karterud, F. and Bateman, A. W. (2012), "Group therapy techniques", in Bateman, A. W. and Fonagy, P. (Eds.), Handbook of Mentalizing in Mental Health Practice, American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc, Washington, DC, London, England, pp. 81-105.
  5. Omar, H., Tejerina-Arreal, M. and Crawford, M. J. (2014), "Are recommendations for psychological treatment of borderline personality disorder in current UK guidelines justified? Systematic review and sub-group analysis", Personality and Mental Health, Vo. 8 No. 3, pp. 228-237.

Authors
Lonargáin, D. Ó., Hodge, S., & Line, R.
Affiliations
  • Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Lancaster University (GB)
Venue
Mental Health Review Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2017-03-13
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
16-27
ISSN
1361-9322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2589907040
Cited by
23
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mental Health Review Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
mentalization-based treatment, borderline personality disorder, service user experiences, group therapy, individual psychotherapy, therapeutic trust, impulsivity, interpersonal problems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review