Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 622

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Designing and using research questionnaires

Open access
Rowley, Jenny·2014·Management Research Review

Abstract

Purpose: – This article aims to draw on experience in supervising new researchers, and the advice of other writers to offer novice researchers such as those engaged in study for a thesis, or in another small-scale research project, a pragmatic introduction to designing and using research questionnaires. Design/methodology/approach: – After a brief introduction, this article is organized into three main sections: designing questionnaires, distributing questionnaires, and analysing and presenting questionnaire data. Within these sections, ten questions often asked by novice researchers are posed and answered. Findings: – This article is designed to give novice researchers advice and support to help them to design good questionnaires, to maximise their response rate, and to undertake appropriate data analysis. Originality/value: – Other research methods texts offer advice on questionnaire design and use, but their advice is not specifically tailored to new researchers. They tend to offer options, but provide limited guidance on making crucial decisions in questionnaire design, distribution and data analysis and presentation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/mrr-02-2013-0027

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Collis, J. and Hussey, R. (2009), Business Research: A Practical Guide for Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students, 3rd ed., Palgrave, Basingstoke.
  2. Denscombe, M. (2010), The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research Projects, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
  3. Fowler, F.J. (2008), Survey Research Methods, 4th ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Oakshott, L. (2009), Essential Quantitative Methods: For Business, Management and Finance, 4th ed., Palgrave, Basingstoke. · DOI
  5. Pallant, J. (2010), SPSS Survival Manual: A Step-by-Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, London.
  6. Saunders, M.N.K. , Thornhill, A. and Lewis, P. (2012), Research Methods for Business Students, 6th ed., FT Prentice-Hall, London.
  7. Sue, V.M. and Pitter, L.A. (2012), Conducting Online Surveys, 2nd ed., Sage, London. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Swift, L. and Piff, S. (2010), Quantitative Methods for Business, Management and Finance, 3rd ed., Palgrave, Basingstoke. · DOI
  9. Bryman, A. (2008), Social Research Methods, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Rowley, J.
Venue
Management Research Review
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2014-03-11
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
308-330
ISSN
2040-8269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001323193
Cited by
622
References
1
FWCI
59.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.