The effect of information overload and disorganisation on intention to purchase online: The role of perceived risk and internet experience
Abstract
Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to develop a research model that examines the effect of information overload and information disorganisation upon customers’ perceived risk and purchase intention online in a single integrative model. In addition the paper investigates whether internet experience moderates these relationships. Design/methodology/approach: – To achieve the paper's objectives an experiment that involved visiting the ten most visited e-commerce web sites in Spain was conducted. Hypotheses were tested by using structural equation modelling on a data set of 1,396 online shopping customers. Findings: – The results suggest a positive relationship between information overload and customer purchase intention and that internet experience reinforces this positive effect. Moreover the results confirm that the relationship between information disorganisation and customer purchase intention is not significant and that internet experience does not moderate the relationship. The findings also indicate that perceived risk mediates the relationship between information overload and information disorganisation on customer purchase intention. Originality/value: – This work contributes to the literature by exploring the phenomenon of information overload and information disorganisation upon customers’ perceived risk and purchase intention in the e-commerce environment as well as the moderating effect of internet experience on these relationships in a single integrative model. The main conclusions of this investigation can be valuable to organisations that implement or intend to implement e-commerce.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Information overload is a main negative consequence of using information technology.
“Studies have shown that information overload is a main negative consequence of using information technology (Lee et al., 2016; Soto-Acosta et al., 2014).”
From Understanding user switch of information seeking: From search engines to generative AI (2026) · cites this paper as Soto-Acosta et al., 2014
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 54 · Cited by 115
- Authors
- Soto-Acosta, P., Jose Molina-Castillo, F., Lopez-Nicolas, C., & Colomo-Palacios, R.
- Venue
- Online Information Review
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2014-06-12
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 543-561
- ISSN
- 1468-4527 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1788852239
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Online Information Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
- Keywords
- information overload, purchase intention, risk perception, online experience, e-commerce, online shopping, moderating effect, e-commerce platforms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review