Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Firm characteristics, board diversity and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Bangladesh

Muttakin, Mohammad Badrul, Khan, Arifur, Subramaniam, Nava·2015·Pacific Accounting Review

Abstract

Purpose: – This study aims to purport to investigate the relationship between firm size, profitability, board diversity (namely, director gender and nationality) and the extent of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosures within a developing nation context. Design/methodology/approach: – The dataset comprises 116 listed Bangladeshi non-financial companies for the period of 2005-2009. A CSR disclosure checklist was used to measure the extent of CSR disclosures in the annual reports and a multiple regression analysis to examine its association with firm characteristics and two board diversity features – female and foreign directorship. Findings: – Results indicate that large and more profitable firms provide more CSR disclosures. It was also found that female directorship has a negative association with CSR disclosures, while foreign directorship has a positive impact on such disclosures. This paper documents that CSR disclosures decrease further when family ownership is higher and there are more female directors on the board. Originality/value: – This study extends empirical evidence on the association between firm characteristics, board diversity and CSR disclosure practices from a developing nation context. Furthermore, this study also reveals that female directors’ impact on firm disclosures may differ between developing and developed nations, and somewhat impeded in the latter. This paper also provides empirical evidence on the importance of appointment of foreign nationals on the boards of developing countries to influence CSR practices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/par-01-2013-0007

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Kaur, A. and Lodhia, S. (2014), “The state of disclosures on stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting in Australian local councils”, Pacific Accounting Review, Special issue on Sustainability Accounting and Reporting , Vol. 26 Nos 1/2, pp. 54-74. · doi:10.1108/par-07-2013-0064
  2. Letendre, L. (2004), “The dynamics of the boardroom”, Academy of Management Executive , Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 101-104.
  3. Purushothaman, M. , Tower, G. , Hancock, R. and Taplin, R. (2000), “Determinants of corporate social reporting practices of listed Singapore companies”, Pacific Accounting Review , Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 101-133.

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Muttakin, M. B., Khan, A., & Subramaniam, N.
Venue
Pacific Accounting Review
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2015-08-03
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
353-372
ISSN
0114-0582 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1510371357
Cited by
267
References
47
FWCI
20.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Firm characteristics, board diversity and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Bangladesh. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/par-01-2013-0007
The paper
Muttakin, M. B., Khan, A., & Subramaniam, N. (2015). Firm characteristics, board diversity and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Bangladesh. Pacific Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/par-01-2013-0007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.