“Neighborhood” influence on police use of force: state-of-the-art review
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a state-of-the-art review on the topic of neighborhood/ecological influence on police use of force. In doing so, it provides an overview of the theoretical formulation and early ethnographic work on the topic as well as an in-depth critique of the issues that require further discussion. Design/methodology/approach Using several databases, a literature search was performed to collect the available empirical studies on the topic. Findings An analysis of the extant literature suggests that neighborhood/ecological influence on police use of force might not be as uniform as previously discussed, and it suffers from the ability to make sufficient comparisons. Tests vary based on the use of force measures, units of analysis, and the neighborhood-level variables examined. Originality/value This review should serve as a point of departure for scholars working in this area moving forward. It is hoped that the review provides thought-provoking commentary on the limitations of previous studies and the challenges facing this line of inquiry in the future.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The decision to use force is influenced by factors beyond T3 training, such as situational context.
“Furthermore, the decision to use force is influenced not only by the approaches highlighted in the T3 training program, but also by aleatory factors such as the context of the situation (Alpert & Dunham, 2004;Shjarback, 2018).”
From Randomized controlled trial of social interaction police training (2020) · cites this paper as Shjarback, 2018
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 60 · Cited by 35
- Authors
- Shjarback, J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shjarback, John
- ORCID
- Shjarback, John
- Venue
- Policing: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2018-04-27
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 859-872
- ISSN
- 1363-951X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2801188824
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 11.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Policing An International Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
- Keywords
- police use of force, neighborhood effects, ecological influences, police-community relations, unit of analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review