Cited by 6

Hoteliers as crime control partners

Morton, Paul J., Luengen, Kelsy, Mazerolle, Lorraine·2019·Policing: An International Journal

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to present evaluation results of Operation Galley, an intelligence-led policing (ILP) intervention that sought to proactively address the problem of drug dealing from hotel rooms by engaging hoteliers as crime control partners with the Queensland Police Service. Design/methodology/approach: Operation Galley, a randomized control field trial, rank ordered and matched 120 hotels on size, star rating, location and estimated degree of suspicious behaviour. Hotels were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: Operation Galley hotels who received a procedurally just letter, followed by a personal visit with detectives; the letter-only hotels who received the procedurally just letter; and the business as usual hotels. Findings: Using repeated measures ANOVA and general linear models, results of the 12-month trial indicate that the Operation Galley condition led to an increase in police engagement with hoteliers, increasing the recognition, reporting and police enforcement of drug offenders. Practical implications: The Operation Galley trial demonstrates that the ILP approach helped foster positive engagement between hoteliers and detectives. The approach cultivated hoteliers as crime control partners and thereby increased the flow of human source intelligence, helping police to better target and respond to drug dealing problems in hotel rooms. Originality/value: Results of the Operation Galley trial demonstrate that hoteliers can be leveraged as crime control partners, providing important human source intelligence about drug dealing and facilitating the capacity of police to better respond to drug problems in hotels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/pijpsm-08-2018-0126

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some included studies conducted general operational intelligence analyses to collect and analyze information on specific cases, or utilized investigative tools such as wiretaps, covert surveillance activities, or human intelligence sources.

    “Furthermore, some studies conducted general operational intelligence analyses to collect and analyze information on specific cases, or utilized investigative tools such as wiretaps, covert surveillance activities, or human intelligence sources (e.g., Morton et al., 2019;Ratcliffe et al., 2017).”
  • Two studies had different emphases: one evaluated whether an ILP program resulted in increased human intelligence collection and detection, while the other primarily aimed to enhance police productivity through predictive policing to detect criminal activity.

    “Two studies had different emphases, with one evaluating whether an ILP program resulted in increased human intelligence collection and detection (Morton et al., 2019), while the other primarily aimed to enhance police productivity through predictive policing to detect criminal activity (Mastrubuoni, 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Morton, P. J., Luengen, K., & Mazerolle, L.
Venue
Policing: An International Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2019-02-11
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
74-88
ISSN
1363-951X
Cited by
6
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review