Reading, writing, and … running? Assessing active space in libraries
Abstract
Purpose: The University of Tennessee Knoxville’s Libraries has set aside space and stocked it with treadmill desks, standing desks, cycling desks and balance chairs to encourage physical activity while using library space to promote active learning. The purpose of this paper is to assess the impact of this innovative space on library users through a study conducted by a research team using observations and short surveys to gather information about usage trends and user perceptions of this “active learning space.” Design/methodology/approach: This study used both ethnographish observation and self-selected survey. Researcher observation notes were used to gather usage rates of the space and equipment in the space, and survey responses were coded for themes to identify user perceptions around the space. Findings: The findings strongly suggest that users find mental and physical health value in the “active learning space” and many would find value in the expansion and improvement of the space. Research limitations/implications: The limitations of this study include a shorter observation period compared to the survey collection period and limited demographic collection to shorten the survey instrument. Originality/value: However, this study was able to assess how an active learning space in an academic library can influence and have a significant impact on student success.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Seven studies investigated emotional engagement; six reported significant improvements and one no effect, resulting in relatively strong evidence strength (85.7%).
“Notably, seven studies investigated emotional engagement, six of which reported significant improvements [13, 17, 22, 25, 31, 34], whereas one reported no effect [38], resulting in relatively strong evidence strength (85.7%).”
From Effect of classroom physical activity breaks on learning behaviors and academic achievements in university students: a systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as [31]
Cites
“Ethnographish”: The State of the Ethnography in Libraries
Lanclos, D., & Asher, A. D. (2016) · Weave: Journal of Library User Experience · doi:10.3998/weave.12535642.0001.503 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Maeda, H., Quartiroli, A., Vos, P. W., Carr, L. J., & Mahar, M. T. (2014) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2014.01.024 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deng, Q., Wu, C., & Yang, L. (2026) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-026-01936-7
- Authors
- Clement, K. A., Carr, S., Johnson, L., Carter, A., Dosch, B. R., Kaufman, J., Fleming-May, R., Mays, R., & Walker, T.
- ORCID
- Clement, Kristina A.
- Venue
- Performance Measurement and Metrics
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2018-08-21
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 166-175
- ISSN
- 1467-8047
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review