Cited by 12

Reading, writing, and … running? Assessing active space in libraries

Clement, Kristina A., Carr, Sian, Johnson, Lauren, Carter, Alexa, Dosch, Brianne Ramsay, Kaufman, Jordan, Fleming-May, Rachel, Mays, Regina +1 more·2018·Performance Measurement and Metrics

Abstract

Purpose: The University of Tennessee Knoxville’s Libraries has set aside space and stocked it with treadmill desks, standing desks, cycling desks and balance chairs to encourage physical activity while using library space to promote active learning. The purpose of this paper is to assess the impact of this innovative space on library users through a study conducted by a research team using observations and short surveys to gather information about usage trends and user perceptions of this “active learning space.” Design/methodology/approach: This study used both ethnographish observation and self-selected survey. Researcher observation notes were used to gather usage rates of the space and equipment in the space, and survey responses were coded for themes to identify user perceptions around the space. Findings: The findings strongly suggest that users find mental and physical health value in the “active learning space” and many would find value in the expansion and improvement of the space. Research limitations/implications: The limitations of this study include a shorter observation period compared to the survey collection period and limited demographic collection to shorten the survey instrument. Originality/value: However, this study was able to assess how an active learning space in an academic library can influence and have a significant impact on student success.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/pmm-03-2018-0011

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clement, K. A., Carr, S., Johnson, L., Carter, A., Dosch, B. R., Kaufman, J., Fleming-May, R., Mays, R., & Walker, T.
Venue
Performance Measurement and Metrics
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2018-08-21
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
166-175
ISSN
1467-8047
Cited by
12
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review