The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Blended Learning Environments
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The blended learning model may have emerged from some limitations observed in fully online learning.
“It can be said that the blended learning model may have emerged from some limitations observed in fully online learning (Osguthorpe & Graham, 2003;Garrison & Kanuka, 2004;Bonk et al., 2005).”
From Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis (2000) · cites this paper as Osguthorpe & Graham, 2003
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Arcilla, 1995, For the love of perfection: Richard Rorty and liberal education
- Meiklejohn, 1882, Andrew Bell: An old educational reformer
- Molinari, D. (2003). The role of social comments in online problem solving groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
- Pask, 1969, Strategy, Competence and conversation as determinants of learning, Programmed-Learning and Educational Technology, 6, 250, 10.1080/1355800690060404 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00136 · Cited by 2,569
Metadata
- Authors
- Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R.
- Affiliations
- Brigham Young University (US)
- ORCID
- Graham, Charles R.
- Venue
- Quarterly Review of Distance Education
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2003-09-15
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 227-233
- ISSN
- 1528-3518 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-1266
- OpenAlex
- W7138895686
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Quarterly review of distance education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- blended learning, blended learning environments, distance education, online and face-to-face instruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
