The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Balancing deterrence: Iran-Israel relations in a turbulent Middle East
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: This paper aims to examine the regional dynamics that further consolidated Israel’s national security in the Middle East in the aftermath of the Arab Spring, reflecting upon the nuclear challenge between Iran and Israel and Iran's expanding activities in the region. Design/methodology/approach: To prove the central argument, the study uses a conceptual framework that centers on deterrence as the main approach used by states to consolidate their influence in the Middle East region. Findings: Iran's nuclear progress and influence in the region has strengthened Israel’s security and fostered an unprecedented open rapprochement led by USA efforts with the Gulf regimes. Originality/value: The paper draws particular attention to the Iran–Israel nuclear competency, and the Israeli preferred policy options regarding Iranian activities in the region amid turbulent Middle East. In addition, the paper offers insight to the regional dynamics that further consolidated Israel’s national security in the region while maintaining a status of Arab vulnerability and backwardness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Israel relies on strong military deterrent and strategic alliances, particularly with the United States.These policies aim to maintain regional stability and prevent Iran from gaining a nuclear advantage that could shift the balance of power (Maher, 2023).”
From Theoretical Analysis of the Iran and Israel Conflict: Identity, Power, and Ideology (2025) · cites this paper as Maher, 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“For Israel, national security is closely tied to countering Iran's influence.Iran's nuclear ambitions and its support for groups like Hezbollah and Hamas heighten this concern.”
From Theoretical Analysis of the Iran and Israel Conflict: Identity, Power, and Ideology (2025) · cites this paper as Maher, 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Emerging Fourth Wave of Deterrence Theory-Toward a New Research Agenda
Lupovici, A. (2010) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00606.x · Cited by 126
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- 2005, Israel-Iranian relations assessed: strategic competition from the power cycle perspective, Iranian Studies, 38, 247, 10.1080/00210860500096329 · DOI
- 1985, The Iranian connection in Israel’s foreign policy: 1948-1951, Middle East Journal, 39, 292
- 2000, Religion and State: The Muslim Approach to Politics, Khomenei and Shi’ite Islam
- 1998, Israel and the Bomb
- 2017, Regional hegemony quests in the Middle East from the balance of power system to the balance of proxy wars, Journal of Gazi Academic View, 11, 133
- 2011, To deter or not to deter: applying historical lessons to the Iranian nuclear challenge, Strategic Studies Quarterly, 5, 50
- 2015, Israel and the Arab Gulf states: from tacit cooperation to reconciliation?, Israel Affairs, 21, 131, 10.1080/13537121.2014.984424 · DOI
- 1973, The balance of power in international history: theory and reality, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 17, 33, 10.1177/002200277301700103 · DOI
- 2012, Israeli defense: the Arab uprisings’ impact, Middle East Quarterly, 39
- 2009, The Iranian revolution of February 1979
- 2014, Israeli nuclear weapons, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 70, 97, 10.1177/0096340214555409 · DOI
- 2013, Structural realism, 77
- 2012, The state of deterrence in international politics today, Contemporary Security Policy, 33, 85, 10.1080/13523260.2012.659589 · DOI
- 2005, Soft balancing against the United States, International Security, 30, 7, 10.1162/0162288054894607 · DOI
- 2016, Deep disquiet: Israel and the Iran nuclear deal, Contemporary Review of the Middle East, 3, 47, 10.1177/2347798916632324 · DOI
- 2014, Iran’s nuclear program and the Israeli-Iranian rivalry in the post revolutionary era, British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 41, 442, 10.1080/13530194.2014.942081 · DOI · Paper page
- Salabili, M. (2013), “Iran and weapons of mass destruction: the military dynamics of nonproliferation”, Discussion Paper, no. 2013-1, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, Mass, March.
- 2018, The competition between Middle East powers: expeditionary bases and non-state proxies, Strategic Assessment, 21, 56
- 2015, Contemporary deterrence theory and counterterrorism, Journal of International Law and Politics, 47, 439
- 1985, Toward a reformulation of the theory of mutual deterrence, International Studies Quarterly, 29, 155, 10.2307/2600504 · DOI
- 1996, Classical deterrence theory: a critical assessment, International Interactions, 21, 365, 10.1080/03050629608434873 · DOI
- Zarif, M.J. (2019), “An insider’s view of Iran’s foreign policy negotiation from strength”, The Institute for Political and International Studies IPIS Journals, pp. 5-26, available at: http://fp.ipisjournals.ir/article_34884.html (accessed 22 May 2019).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Theoretical Analysis of the Iran and Israel Conflict: Identity, Power, and Ideology
Siddiqi, M. U., & Windy Khairunnisa, B. (2025) · Journal of Islamic Civilization and Culture Review · doi:10.58524/jiccr.v1i1.21
Metadata
- Authors
- Maher, N.
- Affiliations
- British University in Egypt (EG)
- Corresponding author
- Maher, Nora
- ORCID
- Maher, Nora
- Venue
- Review of Economics and Political Science
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2020-03-14
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 226-245
- ISSN
- 0387-3285 (ISSN-L)
- 2356-9980
- 2631-3561
- OpenAlex
- W3010931186
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 3.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Seikei ronsō/Review of economics and political science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East Politics and Society
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
- Keywords
- Iran-Israel relations, deterrence, Israeli national security, Iranian nuclear program, Arab Spring, regional influence, Middle East security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
