Cited by 42Information Science and LibrariesDigital and Traditional Archives ManagementInformation Technology Governance and Strategy

An integrated framework to elevate information governance to a national level in South Africa

Mullon, Paul Anthony, Ngoepe, Mpho·2019·Records Management Journal

Abstract

Purpose As an emerging discipline, information governance (IG) presents a number of challenges to organisations and countries. For example, IG has not yet been clearly defined and current proponents present the concepts as records management, information management, enterprise content management, privacy (data protection), freedom of information, corporate governance, information risk, information security and e-discovery, to mention just a few areas. At an organisational level, initiatives focus on one of these aspects, often conflicting with the other elements, and are initiated because of some immediate business challenge, such as the introduction of the Protection of Personal Information Act (data protection or privacy legislation) in South Africa. This is compounded by the fact that the country creates many fragmented policies and pieces of legislation on the same IG aspects which are conducted in a disjointed manner. This study aims to present an integrated IG framework at the country level, comprising key success factors, required instruments (policy and legislation), principles and a proposed list of elements or disciplines, which should be managed in a cohesive manner. Design/methodology/approach This study adopted the Information Governance Initiative’s pinwheel facets of IG to design an integrated framework of elevating IG to country level. The pinwheel helped to identify different facets of information disciplines and the responsible oversight mechanism for implem…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/rmj-09-2018-0030

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The organizational approach to data governance emphasizes structure, responsibility, accountability and reporting.

    “The organizational approach to data governance emphasizes structure, responsibility, accountability and reporting (Mullon & Ngoepe, 2019).”

    From Data governance: Organizing data for trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (2020) · cites this paper as Mullon & Ngoepe, 2019

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mullon, P. A., & Ngoepe, M.
Affiliations
University of South Africa (ZA)
Venue
Records Management Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2019-03-11
Volume
29
Issue
1/2
Pages
103-116
ISSN
0956-5698 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2910805494
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5
FWCI
7.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Records Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Science and Libraries
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Digital and Traditional Archives Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
Keywords
information governance, South Africa, records management, data protection, privacy law, freedom of information, information security, e-discovery, information risk, corporate governance, IT governance, policy fragmentation, oversight mechanisms, success factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review