An integrated framework to elevate information governance to a national level in South Africa
Abstract
Purpose As an emerging discipline, information governance (IG) presents a number of challenges to organisations and countries. For example, IG has not yet been clearly defined and current proponents present the concepts as records management, information management, enterprise content management, privacy (data protection), freedom of information, corporate governance, information risk, information security and e-discovery, to mention just a few areas. At an organisational level, initiatives focus on one of these aspects, often conflicting with the other elements, and are initiated because of some immediate business challenge, such as the introduction of the Protection of Personal Information Act (data protection or privacy legislation) in South Africa. This is compounded by the fact that the country creates many fragmented policies and pieces of legislation on the same IG aspects which are conducted in a disjointed manner. This study aims to present an integrated IG framework at the country level, comprising key success factors, required instruments (policy and legislation), principles and a proposed list of elements or disciplines, which should be managed in a cohesive manner. Design/methodology/approach This study adopted the Information Governance Initiative’s pinwheel facets of IG to design an integrated framework of elevating IG to country level. The pinwheel helped to identify different facets of information disciplines and the responsible oversight mechanism for implem…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The organizational approach to data governance emphasizes structure, responsibility, accountability and reporting.
“The organizational approach to data governance emphasizes structure, responsibility, accountability and reporting (Mullon & Ngoepe, 2019).”
From Data governance: Organizing data for trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (2020) · cites this paper as Mullon & Ngoepe, 2019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Data governance: Organizing data for trustworthy Artificial Intelligence
Janssen, M., Brous, P., Estevez, E., Barbosa, L. S., & Janowski, T. (2020) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101493 · Cited by 811 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mullon, P. A., & Ngoepe, M.
- Affiliations
- University of South Africa (ZA)
- ORCID
- Ngoepe, Mpho
- Venue
- Records Management Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2019-03-11
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1/2
- Pages
- 103-116
- ISSN
- 0956-5698 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2910805494
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 7.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Records Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Science and Libraries
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Digital and Traditional Archives Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Keywords
- information governance, South Africa, records management, data protection, privacy law, freedom of information, information security, e-discovery, information risk, corporate governance, IT governance, policy fragmentation, oversight mechanisms, success factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review