Cited by 58Digital Economy and Work TransformationLegal and Labor StudiesInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

Chapter 3 Platforms at Work: Automated Hiring Platforms and Other New Intermediaries in the Organization of Work

Ajunwa, Ifeoma, Greene, Daniel·2019·Research in the Sociology of Work

Abstract

This chapter lays out a research agenda in the sociology of work for a type of data and organizational intermediary: work platforms. As an example, the authors employ a case study of the adoption of automated hiring platforms (AHPs) in which the authors distinguish between promises and existing practices. The authors draw on two main methods to do so: critical discourse analysis and affordance critique. The authors collected and examined a mix of trade, popular press, and corporate archives; 135 texts in total. The analysis reveals that work platforms offer five core affordances to management: (1) structured data fields optimized for capture and portability within organizations; (2) increased legibility of activity qua data captured inside and outside the workplace; (3) information asymmetry between labor and management; (4) an “ecosystem” design that supports the development of limited-use applications for specific domains; and (5) the standardization of managerial techniques between workplaces. These combine to create a managerial frame for workers as fungible human capital, available on demand and easily ported between job tasks and organizations. While outlining the origin of platform studies within media and communication studies, the authors demonstrate the specific tools the sociology of work brings to the study of platforms within the workplace. The authors conclude by suggesting avenues for future sociological research not only on hiring platforms, but also on other work platforms such as those supporting automated scheduling and customer relationship management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/s0277-283320190000033005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 58

Authors
Ajunwa, I., & Greene, D.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
Research in the Sociology of Work
Published
2019-06-14
Pages
61-91
ISSN
0277-2833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2905125924
Cited by
58
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5
FWCI
66.44
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Research in the sociology of work (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
work platforms, affordances, information asymmetry, management methods, human capital, data portability, platform capitalism, automated scheduling, customer relationship management, labor relations, legibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review