Wild Bootstrap Randomization Inference for Few Treated Clusters
Open accessAbstract
When there are few treated clusters in a pure treatment or difference-in-differences setting, t tests based on a cluster-robust variance estimator can severely over-reject. Although procedures based on the wild cluster bootstrap often work well when the number of treated clusters is not too small, they can either over-reject or under-reject seriously when it is. In a previous paper, we showed that procedures based on randomization inference (RI) can work well in such cases. However, RI can be impractical when the number of possible randomizations is small. We propose a bootstrap-based alternative to RI, which mitigates the discrete nature of RI p values in the few-clusters case. We also compare it to two other procedures. None of them works perfectly when the number of clusters is very small, but they can work surprisingly well.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction
Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (2015) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139025751 · Cited by 4,210 · see citing works
Inference with Difference-in-Differences and Other Panel Data
Donald, S. G., & Lang, K. (2007) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.89.2.221 · Cited by 1,324 · see citing works
Inference with “Difference in Differences” with a Small Number of Policy Changes
Conley, T. G., & Taber, C. R. (2011) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00049 · Cited by 633 · see citing works
Inference with dependent data using cluster covariance estimators
Bester, C. A., Conley, T. G., & Hansen, C. B. (2011) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2011.01.007 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Introductory Guide to Event Study Models
Miller, D. L. (2023) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.37.2.203 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
The wild bootstrap for few (treated) clusters
MacKinnon, J. G., & Webb, M. D. (2018) · The Econometrics Journal · doi:10.1111/ectj.12107 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Self-citationInference with a single treated cluster
Hagemann, A. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.04076 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- MacKinnon, J. G., & Webb, M. D.
- Affiliations
- Queen's University (CA)
- Carleton University (CA)
- Venue
- The Econometrics of Complex Survey Data
- Publisher
- Emerald Publishing Limited
- Published
- 2019-04-10
- Pages
- 61-85
- OpenAlex
- W2811159429
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 13.22
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- ageconsearch.umn.edu
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.emeraldinsight.com/page/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
- AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
- Keywords
- randomization inference, wild bootstrap, cluster-robust variance estimation, over-rejection, difference-in-differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review