Cited by 21Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsSpatial and Panel Data Analysis

Wild Bootstrap Randomization Inference for Few Treated Clusters

Open access
MacKinnon, James G., Webb, Matthew D.·2019·The Econometrics of Complex Survey Data

Abstract

When there are few treated clusters in a pure treatment or difference-in-differences setting, t tests based on a cluster-robust variance estimator can severely over-reject. Although procedures based on the wild cluster bootstrap often work well when the number of treated clusters is not too small, they can either over-reject or under-reject seriously when it is. In a previous paper, we showed that procedures based on randomization inference (RI) can work well in such cases. However, RI can be impractical when the number of possible randomizations is small. We propose a bootstrap-based alternative to RI, which mitigates the discrete nature of RI p values in the few-clusters case. We also compare it to two other procedures. None of them works perfectly when the number of clusters is very small, but they can work surprisingly well.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/s0731-905320190000039003

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacKinnon, J. G., & Webb, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • Carleton University (CA)
Venue
The Econometrics of Complex Survey Data
Published
2019-04-10
Pages
61-85
OpenAlex
W2811159429
Cited by
21
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
13.22
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
Keywords
randomization inference, wild bootstrap, cluster-robust variance estimation, over-rejection, difference-in-differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review