The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Advances in Motivation and Achievement
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/0273-2297(92)90011-p · Cited by 1,717
Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students
Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20131 · Cited by 1,155
Academic self‐concept and academic achievement: Relations and causal ordering
Marsh, H. W., & Martin, A. J. (2011) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1348/000709910x503501 · Cited by 975
Achievement Goal Theory at the Crossroads: Old Controversies, Current Challenges, and New Directions
Senko, C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2011) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.538646 · Cited by 913
Math Anxiety: Past Research, Promising Interventions, and a New Interpretation Framework
Ramirez, G., Shaw, S. T., & Maloney, E. A. (2018) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2018.1447384 · Cited by 578
Metadata
- Venue
- Advances in Motivation and Achievement
- Publisher
- Emerald Group Publishing Limited
- Published
- 2012-01
- Pages
- ii
- ISSN
- 0749-7423 (ISSN-L)
- DOI
- 10.1108/s0749-7423(2012)0000017018
- OpenAlex
- W4230582671
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 0
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advances in Motivation and Achievement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/s0749-7423(2012)0000017018
- The paper
- Advances in Motivation and Achievement. (2012). Advances in Motivation and Achievement. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0749-7423(2012)0000017018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
