The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Contemporary Commentary on Appreciative Inquiry in Organizational Life
Abstract
It’s been nearly 30 years since the original articulation of Appreciative Inquiry in Organizational Life was written in collaboration with my remarkable mentor Suresh Srivastva (Cooperrider & Srivastva, 1987). That article generated more experimentation in the field, more academic excitement, and more innovation than anything we had ever written. As the passage of time has enabled me to look more closely at what was written, I feel both a deep satisfaction with the seed vision and scholarly logic offered for Appreciative Inquiry (AI), as well as well as the enormous impact and reverberation. Following the tradition of authors such as Carl Rogers who have re-issued their favorite works but have also added brief reflections on key points of emphasis, clarification, or editorial commentary we have decided to issue a reprint the early article by David L. Cooperrider and the late Suresh Srivastva in its entirety, but also with contemporary comments embedded. To be sure the comments offered are brief and serve principally to add points of emphasis to ideas we may have too hurriedly introduced. My comments – placed in indented format along the way – are focused on the content and themes of furthermost relevance to this volume on organizational generativity. In many ways I’ve begun to question today whether there can even be inquiry where there is no appreciation, valuing, or amazement – what the Greeks called thaumazein – the borderline between wonderment and admiration. One learning is that AI’s generativity is not about its methods or tools, but about our cooperative capacity to reunite seeming opposites such as theory as practice, the secular as sacred, and generativity as something beyond positivity or negativity. Appreciation is about valuing the life-giving in ways that serve to inspire our co-constructed future. Inquiry is the experience of mystery, moving beyond the edge of the known to the unknown, which then changes our lives. Taken together, where appreciation and inquiry are wonderfully entangled, we experience knowledge alive and an ever-expansive inauguration of our world to new possibilities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113
Action Research and Minority Problems
Lewin, K. (1946) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x · Cited by 6,554
Cited by
Dewar, B., & Nolan, M. (2013) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.01.008 · Cited by 306
A functional natural dentition for all—and for life? The oral healthcare system needs revision
Fejerskov, O., Escobar, G., Jøssing, M., & Baelum, V. (2013) · Journal of Oral Rehabilitation · doi:10.1111/joor.12082 · Cited by 75
Improving vascular access outcomes: attributes of arteriovenous fistula cannulation success
Harwood, L. E., Wilson, B. M., & Oudshoorn, A. (2016) · Clinical Kidney Journal · doi:10.1093/ckj/sfv158 · Cited by 32
Nield, L., Bhanbhro, S., Steers, H., Young, A., & Fowler Davis, S. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11182499 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooperrider, D. L.
- Venue
- Organizational Generativity: The Appreciative Inquiry Summit and a Scholarship of Transformation
- Publisher
- Emerald Group Publishing Limited
- Published
- 2013-12-05
- Pages
- 3-67
- DOI
- 10.1108/s1475-9152(2013)0000004001
- OpenAlex
- W2499691615
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 270.04
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Contemporary Commentary on Appreciative Inquiry in Organizational Life. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/s1475-9152(2013)0000004001
- The paper
- Cooperrider, D. L. (2013). A Contemporary Commentary on Appreciative Inquiry in Organizational Life. Organizational Generativity: The Appreciative Inquiry Summit and a Scholarship of Transformation. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1475-9152(2013)0000004001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.