The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring the role of social capital in facilitating supply chain resilience
Abstract
Purpose: There has been limited research examining the influence of inter‐organisational relationships and the social capital they may nurture in building SCRES. The authors aim to explore how three dimensions of social capital (cognitive, structural and relational) may act as facilitators or enablers of the four formative capabilities for SCRES (i.e. flexibility, velocity, visibility, and collaboration), identified by Jüttner and Maklan. Design/methodology/approach: Data were collected from three separate tiers of the supply chain involved in the response to an extreme event (the Lambrigg, UK rail crash). Using a social constructionist approach, the paper explores how social capital may enable the emergence of formative capabilities for resilience. Findings: The data suggest that the dimensions of social capital may play an influential role in facilitating the four formative capabilities for SCRES and indicate the potential for these to be mutually reinforcing. Research limitations/implications: The paper provides an illustration of some links between resilience and social capital constructs within one supply network, in the context of crisis response. Different types of network and contexts may result in other outcomes and have other facilitating effects upon SCRES. These findings should be explored within other contexts. Practical implications: The authors highlight that social capital may be nurtured deliberately or emerge as a consequence of relationships within a network. Formal efforts to build network communications, norms of reciprocity may create the conditions for appropriable organisations to emerge when faced with extreme events. Originality/value: Drawing from a social capital perspective, this paper contributes to a fuller understanding of notions of relational capital.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.5.502 · Cited by 3,078
Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital
Burt, R. S. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199249145.001.0001 · Cited by 2,203
Cited by
Lohmer, J., Bugert, N., & Lasch, R. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107882 · Cited by 404
Supply chain resilience: new challenges and opportunities
Shi, X., Liu, W., & Lim, M. K. (2024) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2023.2262396 · Cited by 39
Papaioannou, G., Mohammed, A.-M., Despoudi, S., Saridakis, G., & Papadopoulos, T. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102077 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, N., Elliott, D., & Drake, P.
- Venue
- Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2013-04-24
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 324-336
- ISSN
- 1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2051452486
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 28.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring the role of social capital in facilitating supply chain resilience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/scm-06-2012-0203
- The paper
- Johnson, N., Elliott, D., & Drake, P. (2013). Exploring the role of social capital in facilitating supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-06-2012-0203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.