The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effective supply chain management: Understanding the impact of complexity and mitigation strategies
Abstract
Purpose: Reviews the latest management developments across the globe and pinpoints practical implications from cutting-edge research and case studies. Design/methodology/approach: This briefing is prepared by an independent writer who adds their own impartial comments and places the articles in context. Findings: As soon as the UK voted to leave the European Union (EU) in 2017, one of the key discussions among businesses throughout Europe centered on what the likely impact would be on supply chains involving UK companies. Whether you were a mainland European country with supply chain partners in the UK, or a UK manufacturer that depended on European companies for supplies, the uncertainty and potential disruption to well-grooved supply chain processes became a major headache. At first, it was the uncertainty that proved the major issue as governments played politics and refused to define the likely deal that would enable supply chain terms to be put in place. As the UK left the EU and the terms of the overall deal became clearer, firms then had to work out how whether any necessary changes to their supply chains were required. Practical implications: Provides strategic insights and practical thinking that have influenced some of the world’s leading organizations. Original/value: The briefing saves busy executives and researchers hours of reading time by selecting only the very best, most pertinent information and presenting it in a condensed and easy-to-digest format.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intelligent agents: theory and practice
Wooldridge, M., & Jennings, N. R. (1995) · The Knowledge Engineering Review · doi:10.1017/s0269888900008122 · Cited by 6,810
The interdisciplinary study of coordination
Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/174666.174668 · Cited by 3,504
Cited by
A framework of supply chain management literature
Tan, K. C. (2001) · European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management · doi:10.1016/s0969-7012(00)00020-4 · Cited by 895
KANNAN, V (2005) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2004.03.012 · Cited by 720
An empirical investigation of net-enabled business value
Barua, A., Konana, P., Whinston, A. B., & Yin, F. (2004) · doi:10.5555/2017236.2017240 · Cited by 623
International supply chain agility ‐ Tradeoffs between flexibility and uncertainty
Prater, E., Biehl, M., & Smith, M. A. (2001) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570110390507 · Cited by 527
e‐Integration in the Supply Chain: Barriers and Performance*
Frohlich, M. T. (2002) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2002.tb01655.x · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Venue
- Strategic Direction
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2020-06-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 27-29
- ISSN
- 0258-0543 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W203110341
- Cited by
- 898
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effective supply chain management: Understanding the impact of complexity and mitigation strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/sd-04-2020-0081
- The paper
- Effective supply chain management: Understanding the impact of complexity and mitigation strategies. (2020). Strategic Direction. https://doi.org/10.1108/sd-04-2020-0081
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.