Cited by 33Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisChild Welfare and AdoptionCriminal Justice and Penology

Safety at a girls secure juvenile justice facility

Elwyn, Laura J., Esaki, Nina, Smith, Carolyn A.·2015·Therapeutic Communities: The International Journal of Therapeutic Communities

Abstract

Purpose: – Serious juvenile delinquency is a significant and costly problem in the society. However, custodial environments often exacerbate current problems and promote recidivism. Girls’ delinquency, in particular, may call for trauma-informed approaches within organizations that serve the most serious offenders. The purpose of this paper is to explore whether implementation of a trauma-informed intervention that aims to change the therapeutic stand of the organization, the Sanctuary Model®, corresponded with improved indicators of physical and psychological safety of staff and youth at a female secure juvenile justice facility. Design/methodology/approach: – This study utilizes quantitative administrative and performance-based standards (PbS) data routinely collected at the facility. Findings: – Findings suggest that the facility was a safer place for both residents and staff after implementation of the model. Its safety indicators also compare favorably to those of the juvenile justice correctional field in general. Research limitations/implications: – This study was constrained by a number of limitations, including lack of some desirable detail on the PbS measures and on a comparable field group of girls’ facilities. It is also hard to assess the impact of other concurrent changes in the facility. Future research that addresses these issues would be useful in further determining the utility of the model. Originality/value: – This study is the first to examine the impact of a structured trauma-informed organizational change intervention based on therapeutic communities principles, namely the Sanctuary Model, on staff and youth in a secure juvenile justice facility. Findings may be of value to practitioners, administrators, policy makers, and researchers in the corrections field.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/tc-11-2014-0038

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most other empirically-supported models are based on studies at a single agency, making it difficult to know the extent to which findings were influenced by unique conditions at those locations.

    “Most other empirically-supported models are based on studies at a single agency (Elwyn, Esaki, and Smith, 2015;Hodgdon et al., 2013;McCall et al., 2010;McCurdy & McIntyre, 2004;Morral, McCaffrey, & Ridgeway, 2004;Rivard, Bloom, McCorkle, & Abramovitz, 2005), making it difficult to know the extent to which findings were influenced by unique conditions at those locations.”

    From Improving relationship quality in group care settings: The impact of implementing the CARE model (2020) · cites this paper as Elwyn, Esaki, and Smith, 2015

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elwyn, L. J., Esaki, N., & Smith, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Advocates for Human Potential (United States) (US)
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
Venue
Therapeutic Communities: The International Journal of Therapeutic Communities
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2015-12-14
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
209-218
ISSN
0964-1866 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164730036
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Therapeutic Communities The International Journal of Therapeutic Communities (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
Sanctuary Model, trauma-informed interventions, organizational change, staff safety, youth safety, performance-based standards, therapeutic communities, recidivism, women offenders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review