Cited by 270Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringSpinal Cord Injury ResearchStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

An externally powered, multichannel, implantable stimulator-telemeter for control of paralyzed muscle

Smith, B., Zhengnian Tang, Johnson, M.W., Pourmehdi, S., Gazdik, M.M., Buckett, J.R., Peckham, P.H.·1998·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

An implantable integrated stimulator and telemetry system has been developed. The system is capable of fulfilling the stimulus and telemetry needs of advanced functional neuromuscular stimulation (FNS) applications requiring multiple channels of stimulation and multiple channels of sensor or biopotential sensing. This system provides a command control structure, an inductive radio frequency link providing power to the implant device as well as two-way transcutaneous communication, an ASIC for decoding the command and for providing functional control within the implant, and modular circuitry providing the application specific implant functions. Biocompatible hermetic packaging, lead systems, and in-line connectors suitable for long-term implantation, provide encapsulation for the circuitry and access to the electrodes and sensors used in the application. The first implant configuration realized from this modular system is targeted for clinical implementation in persons with tetraplegia at the C6 level for restoration of hand function, using wrist position as the command control source. The implant device realized has ten channels of stimulation and telemetry used to control and sense a joint angle transducer implanted in the radio-carpal joint of the wrist. A prototype device has been fabricated and is undergoing testing in an animal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/10.664202

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Motor units in their absolute refractory period, which lasts between 1.5 and 2.1 ms, will not respond to stimulation.

    “Another method for quantifying selectivity takes advantage of the concept that motor units in their absolute refractory period, which lasts between 1.5 and 2.1 ms, will not respond to stimulation [1,3,6,11-15].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 270

Authors
Smith, B., Tang, Z., Johnson, M. W., Pourmehdi, S., Gazdik, M. M., Buckett, J. R., & Peckham, P. H.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland Medical Devices (US)
  • University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
  • Cleveland FES Center (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
1998-04
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
463-475
ISSN
0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099251382
Cited by
270
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Rehabilitation Research and Development Service
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS029549, NS-29549)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
implantable stimulator, functional electrical stimulation, tetraplegia, hand function recovery, biopotential sensing, ASIC, hermetic packaging
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Carpal Bones, Dogs, Electric Stimulation, Equipment Design, Paralysis, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Telemetry, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Transducers, Prostheses and Implants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review