An externally powered, multichannel, implantable stimulator-telemeter for control of paralyzed muscle
Abstract
An implantable integrated stimulator and telemetry system has been developed. The system is capable of fulfilling the stimulus and telemetry needs of advanced functional neuromuscular stimulation (FNS) applications requiring multiple channels of stimulation and multiple channels of sensor or biopotential sensing. This system provides a command control structure, an inductive radio frequency link providing power to the implant device as well as two-way transcutaneous communication, an ASIC for decoding the command and for providing functional control within the implant, and modular circuitry providing the application specific implant functions. Biocompatible hermetic packaging, lead systems, and in-line connectors suitable for long-term implantation, provide encapsulation for the circuitry and access to the electrodes and sensors used in the application. The first implant configuration realized from this modular system is targeted for clinical implementation in persons with tetraplegia at the C6 level for restoration of hand function, using wrist position as the command control source. The implant device realized has ten channels of stimulation and telemetry used to control and sense a joint angle transducer implanted in the radio-carpal joint of the wrist. A prototype device has been fabricated and is undergoing testing in an animal.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Motor units in their absolute refractory period, which lasts between 1.5 and 2.1 ms, will not respond to stimulation.
“Another method for quantifying selectivity takes advantage of the concept that motor units in their absolute refractory period, which lasts between 1.5 and 2.1 ms, will not respond to stimulation [1,3,6,11-15].”
From Optimization of selective stimulation parameters for multi-contact electrodes (2013) · cites this paper as [13]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 270
- Authors
- Smith, B., Tang, Z., Johnson, M. W., Pourmehdi, S., Gazdik, M. M., Buckett, J. R., & Peckham, P. H.
- Affiliations
- Cleveland Medical Devices (US)
- University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
- Cleveland FES Center (US)
- ORCID
- Buckett, J.R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 463-475
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099251382
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 2.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Rehabilitation Research and Development Service
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS029549, NS-29549)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Keywords
- implantable stimulator, functional electrical stimulation, tetraplegia, hand function recovery, biopotential sensing, ASIC, hermetic packaging
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Animals, Carpal Bones, Dogs, Electric Stimulation, Equipment Design, Paralysis, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Telemetry, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Transducers, Prostheses and Implants
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review