The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Geometrical aspects of the interindividual variability of multilead ECG recordings
Abstract
The electrocardiogram (ECG) as measured from healthy subjects shows a considerable interindividual variability. This variability is caused by geometrical as well as by physiological factors. In this study, the relative contribution of the geometrical factors is estimated. In addition a method aimed at correcting for these factors is described. First, a measure (RV) for quantifying the overall variability is presented, and for healthy individuals its value is estimated as 0.52. Next, based on a simulation study using the individual (heart-lung-torso) geometry of 25 subjects, the variability caused by geometrical factors is estimated as 0.40, indicating that in healthy subjects the RV for healthy individuals resulting from electrophysiology is of the order of 0.33. In an evaluation of the correction procedure, applied to realistic, simulated body surface potentials, it is shown that RV caused by geometrical factors can be reduced from 0.40 to 0.06. When applying the correction procedure to measured ECG data no reduction of the RV value could be demonstrated. These results indicate that the involved procedure of the inverse computation of a cardiac equivalent source, at the present time, is of insufficient quality to cash in on the substantial reduction of RV values from 0.52 down to 0.33 that might be obtainable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Solving Least Squares Problems
Lawson, C. L., & Hanson, R. J. (1995) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611971217 · Cited by 7,103
Singular value decomposition and least squares solutions
Golub, G. H., & Reinsch, C. (1970) · Numerische Mathematik · doi:10.1007/bf02163027 · Cited by 2,929
Cited by
Real-Time Patient-Specific ECG Classification by 1-D Convolutional Neural Networks
Kiranyaz, S., Ince, T., & Gabbouj, M. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2015.2468589 · Cited by 1,912
A Generic and Robust System for Automated Patient-Specific Classification of ECG Signals
Ince, T., Kiranyaz, S., & Gabbouj, M. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2009.2013934 · Cited by 481
Ecg pattern analysis for emotion detection
Agrafioti, F., Hatzinakos, D., & Anderson, A. K. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/t-affc.2011.28 · Cited by 476
LSTM-Based ECG Classification for Continuous Monitoring on Personal Wearable Devices
Saadatnejad, S., Oveisi, M., & Hashemi, M. (2020) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2019.2911367 · Cited by 406
Acharya, U. R., Fujita, H., Lih, O. S., Adam, M., Tan, J. H., & Chua, C. K. (2017) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2017.06.003 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoekema, R., Uijen, G. J. H., & van Oosterom, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 551-559
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168028135
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geometrical aspects of the interindividual variability of multilead ECG recordings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/10.918594
- The paper
- Hoekema, R., Uijen, G. J. H., & van Oosterom, A. (2001). Geometrical aspects of the interindividual variability of multilead ECG recordings. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.918594
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.