Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 337

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Super-exponential methods for blind deconvolution

Shalvi, O., Weinstein, E.·1993·IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

Abstract

A class of iterative methods for solving the blind deconvolution problem, i.e. for recovering the input of an unknown possibly nonminimum-phase linear system by observation of its output, is presented. These methods are universal do not require prior knowledge of the input distribution, are computationally efficient and statistically stable, and converge to the desired solution regardless of initialization at a very fast rate. The effects of finite length of the data, finite length of the equalizer, and additive noise in the system on the attainable performance (intersymbol interference) are analyzed. It is shown that in many cases of practical interest the performance of the proposed methods is far superior to linear prediction methods even for minimum phase systems. Recursive and sequential algorithms are also developed, which allow real-time implementation and adaptive equalization of time-varying systems.>

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/18.212280

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 337

Metadata

Authors
Shalvi, O., & Weinstein, E.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Published
1993-03
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
504-519
ISSN
  • 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9654
OpenAlex
W2132796249
Cited by
337
References
1
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Super-exponential methods for blind deconvolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/18.212280
The paper
Shalvi, O., & Weinstein, E. (1993). Super-exponential methods for blind deconvolution. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.212280

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.