The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A sequential procedure for multihypothesis testing
Abstract
The sequential testing of more than two hypotheses has important applications in direct-sequence spread spectrum signal acquisition, multiple-resolution-element radar, and other areas. A useful sequential test which we term the MSPRT is studied in this paper. The test is shown to be a generalization of the sequential probability ratio test. Under Bayesian assumptions, it is argued that the MSPRT approximates the much more complicated optimal test when error probabilities are small and expected stopping times are large. Bounds on error probabilities are derived, and asymptotic expressions for the stopping time and error probabilities are given. A design procedure is presented for determining the parameters of the MSPRT. Two examples involving Gaussian densities are included, and comparisons are made between simulation results and asymptotic expressions. Comparisons with Bayesian fixed sample size tests are also made, and it is found that the MSPRT requires two to three times fewer samples on average.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bellman, R. E. (2010) · doi:10.1515/9781400835386 · Cited by 14,588
Cited by
The Basal Ganglia and Cortex Implement Optimal Decision Making Between Alternative Actions
Bogacz, R., & Gurney, K. (2007) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2007.19.2.442 · Cited by 417
Optimal decision-making theories: linking neurobiology with behaviour
Bogacz, R. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.006 · Cited by 379
The dynamics of choice among multiple alternatives
McMillen, T., & Holmes, P. (2006) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2005.10.003 · Cited by 153
Relation between belief and performance in perceptual decision making
Drugowitsch, J., Moreno-Bote, R., & Pouget, A. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096511 · Cited by 72
Application-specific compression for time delay estimation in sensor networks
Vasudevan, L., Ortega, A., & Mitra, U. (2003) · Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems · doi:10.1145/958491.958520 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Baum, C. W., & Veeravalli, V. V.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1994-2007
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136414026
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A sequential procedure for multihypothesis testing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/18.340472
- The paper
- Baum, C. W., & Veeravalli, V. V. (1994). A sequential procedure for multihypothesis testing. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.340472
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.