The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The context-tree weighting method: basic properties
Open accessAbstract
Describes a sequential universal data compression procedure for binary tree sources that performs the "double mixture." Using a context tree, this method weights in an efficient recursive way the coding distributions corresponding to all bounded memory tree sources, and achieves a desirable coding distribution for tree sources with an unknown model and unknown parameters. Computational and storage complexity of the proposed procedure are both linear in the source sequence length. The authors derive a natural upper bound on the cumulative redundancy of the method for individual sequences. The three terms in this bound can be identified as coding, parameter, and model redundancy, The bound holds for all source sequence lengths, not only for asymptotically large lengths. The analysis that leads to this bound is based on standard techniques and turns out to be extremely simple. The upper bound on the redundancy shows that the proposed context-tree weighting procedure is optimal in the sense that it achieves the Rissanen (1984) lower bound.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
Cited by
The minimum description length principle in coding and modeling
Barron, A., Rissanen, J., & Yu, B. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.720554 · Cited by 1,019
Physically Unclonable Functions: A Study on the State of the Art and Future Research Directions
Maes, R., & Verbauwhede, I. (2010) · Information Security and Cryptography · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14452-3_1 · Cited by 469
The power of amnesia: Learning probabilistic automata with variable memory length
Ron, D., Singer, Y., & Tishby, N. (1997) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00114008 · Cited by 447
Merhav, N., & Feder, M. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.720534 · Cited by 438
Information Theory and Statistics: A Tutorial
Csiszár, I., & Shields, P. C. (2004) · Foundations and Trends™ in Communications and Information Theory · doi:10.1561/0100000004 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Willems, F. M. J., Shtarkov, Y. M., & Tjalkens, T. J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 653-664
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163294786
- Cited by
- 919
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The context-tree weighting method: basic properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/18.382012
- The paper
- Willems, F. M. J., Shtarkov, Y. M., & Tjalkens, T. J. (1995). The context-tree weighting method: basic properties. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.382012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.