The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Iterative decoding of binary block and convolutional codes
Abstract
Iterative decoding of two-dimensional systematic convolutional codes has been termed "turbo" (de)coding. Using log-likelihood algebra, we show that any decoder can be used which accepts soft inputs-including a priori values-and delivers soft outputs that can be split into three terms: the soft channel and a priori inputs, and the extrinsic value. The extrinsic value is used as an a priori value for the next iteration. Decoding algorithms in the log-likelihood domain are given not only for convolutional codes but also for any linear binary systematic block code. The iteration is controlled by a stop criterion derived from cross entropy, which results in a minimal number of iterations. Optimal and suboptimal decoders with reduced complexity are presented. Simulation results show that very simple component codes are sufficient, block codes are appropriate for high rates and convolutional codes for lower rates less than 2/3. Any combination of block and convolutional component codes is possible. Several interleaving techniques are described. At a bit error rate (BER) of 10/sup -4/ the performance is slightly above or around the bounds given by the cutoff rate for reasonably simple block/convolutional component codes, interleaver sizes less than 1000 and for three to six iterations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Convergence behavior of iteratively decoded parallel concatenated codes
ten Brink, S. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/26.957394 · Cited by 2,386
On the design of low-density parity-check codes within 0.0045 dB of the Shannon limit
Chung, S.-Y., Forney, G. D., Richardson, T. J., & Urbanke, R. (2001) · IEEE Communications Letters · doi:10.1109/4234.905935 · Cited by 1,539
MDPC-McEliece: New McEliece variants from Moderate Density Parity-Check codes
Misoczki, R., Tillich, J.-P., Sendrier, N., & Barreto, P. S. L. M. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/isit.2013.6620590 · Cited by 420
Classifying Radio Galaxies with the Convolutional Neural Network
Aniyan, A. K., & Thorat, K. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa7333 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Hagenauer, J., Offer, E., & Papke, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 429-445
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146694142
- Cited by
- 2,303
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 64.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Iterative decoding of binary block and convolutional codes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/18.485714
- The paper
- Hagenauer, J., Offer, E., & Papke, L. (1996). Iterative decoding of binary block and convolutional codes. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.485714
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.