The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Power-law shot noise
Abstract
The behavior of power-law shot noise, for which the associated impulse response functions assume a decaying power-law form, is explored. Expressions are obtained for the moments, moment generating functions, amplitude probability density functions, autocorrelation functions, and power spectral densities for a variety of parameters of the process. For certain parameters the power spectral density exhibits 1/f-type behavior over a substantial range of frequencies, so that the process serves as a source of 1/f/sup alpha / shot noise for alpha in the range 0>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stochastic geometry and random graphs for the analysis and design of wireless networks
Haenggi, M., Andrews, J. G., Baccelli, F., Dousse, O., & Franceschetti, M. (2009) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2009.090902 · Cited by 1,719
Kasdin, N. J. (1995) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.381848 · Cited by 532
Metadata
- Authors
- Lowen, S. B., & Teich, M. C.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1302-1318
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021051891
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Power-law shot noise. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/18.59930
- The paper
- Lowen, S. B., & Teich, M. C. (1990). Power-law shot noise. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.59930
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
