The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantized overcomplete expansions in IR/sup N/: analysis, synthesis, and algorithms
Open accessAbstract
Coefficient quantization has peculiar qualitative effects on representations of vectors in IR with respect to overcomplete sets of vectors. These effects are investigated in two settings: frame expansions (representations obtained by forming inner products with each element of the set) and matching pursuit expansions (approximations obtained by greedily forming linear combinations). In both cases, based on the concept of consistency, it is shown that traditional linear reconstruction methods are suboptimal, and better consistent reconstruction algorithms are given. The proposed consistent reconstruction algorithms were in each case implemented, and experimental results are included. For frame expansions, results are proven to bound distortion as a function of frame redundancy r and quantization step size for linear, consistent, and optimal reconstruction methods. Taken together, these suggest that optimal reconstruction methods will yield O(1/r/sup 2/) mean-squared error (MSE), and that consistency is sufficient to insure this asymptotic behavior. A result on the asymptotic tightness of random frames is also proven. Applicability of quantized matching pursuit to lossy vector compression is explored. Experiments demonstrate the likelihood that a linear reconstruction is inconsistent, the MSE reduction obtained with a nonlinear (consistent) reconstruction algorithm, and generally competitive performance at low bit rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis
Daubechies, I. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.57199 · Cited by 6,483
Cited by
Method of optimal directions for frame design
Engan, K., Aase, S. O., & Hakon Husoy, J. (1999) · 1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings. ICASSP99 (Cat. No.99CH36258) · doi:10.1109/icassp.1999.760624 · Cited by 1,253
Designing structured tight frames via an alternating projection method
Tropp, J. A., Dhillon, I. S., Heath, R. W., & Strohmer, T. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2004.839492 · Cited by 494
Normalized Iterative Hard Thresholding: Guaranteed Stability and Performance
Blumensath, T., & Davies, M. E. (2010) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2010.2042411 · Cited by 485
Analog Beamforming in MIMO Communications With Phase Shift Networks and Online Channel Estimation
Venkateswaran, V., & van der Veen, A.-J. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2010.2048321 · Cited by 396
Foundations of Signal Processing
Vetterli, M., Kovačević, J., & Goyal, V. K. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139839099 · Cited by 393
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Goyal, V. K., Vetterli, M., & Thao, N. T.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-31
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976318178
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantized overcomplete expansions in IR/sup N/: analysis, synthesis, and algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/18.650985
- The paper
- Goyal, V. K., Vetterli, M., & Thao, N. T. (1998). Quantized overcomplete expansions in IR/sup N/: analysis, synthesis, and algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.650985
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.