The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improved decoding of Reed-Solomon and algebraic-geometry codes
Abstract
Given an error-correcting code over strings of length n and an arbitrary input string also of length n, the list decoding problem is that of finding all codewords within a specified Hamming distance from the input string. We present an improved list decoding algorithm for decoding Reed-Solomon codes. The list decoding problem for Reed-Solomon codes reduces to the following "curve-fitting" problem over a field F: given n points ((x/sub i//spl middot/y/sub i/))/sub i=1//sup n/, x/sub i/, y/sub i//spl isin/F, and a degree parameter k and error parameter e, find all univariate polynomials p of degree at most k such that y/sub i/=p(x/sub i/) for all but at most e values of i/spl isin/(1,...,n). We give an algorithm that solves this problem for e1/3, where the result yields the first asymptotic improvement in four decades. The algorithm generalizes to solve the list decoding problem for other algebraic codes, specifically alternant codes (a class of codes including BCH codes) and algebraic-geometry codes. In both cases, we obtain a list decoding algorithm that corrects up to n-/spl radic/(n(n-d')) errors, where n is the block length and d' is the designed distance of the code. The improvement for the case of algebraic-geometry codes extends the methods of Shokrollahi and Wasserman (see in Proc. 29th Annu. ACM Symp. Theory of Computing, p.241-48, 1998) and improves upon their bound for every choice of n and d'. We also present some other consequences of our algorithm including a solution to a weighted curve-fitting problem, which may be of use in soft-decision decoding algorithms for Reed-Solomon codes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An algebraic approach to IP traceback
Dean, D., Franklin, M., & Stubblefield, A. (2002) · ACM Transactions on Information and System Security · doi:10.1145/505586.505588 · Cited by 447
Pseudorandom Generators without the XOR Lemma
Sudan, M., Trevisan, L., & Vadhan, S. (2001) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1006/jcss.2000.1730 · Cited by 393
Self-citationXu, C., Ma, B., Gao, Z., Dong, X., Zhao, C., & Liu, H. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abk0100 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Guruswami, V., & Sudan, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1757-1767
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032431003
- Cited by
- 998
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved decoding of Reed-Solomon and algebraic-geometry codes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/18.782097
- The paper
- Guruswami, V., & Sudan, M. (1999). Improved decoding of Reed-Solomon and algebraic-geometry codes. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.782097
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.