Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,949

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Uncertainty principles and ideal atomic decomposition

Donoho, D.L., Huo, X.·2001·IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

Abstract

Suppose a discrete-time signal S(t), 0/spl les/t<N, is a superposition of atoms taken from a combined time-frequency dictionary made of spike sequences 1/sub {t=/spl tau/}/ and sinusoids exp{2/spl pi/iwt/N}//spl radic/N. Can one recover, from knowledge of S alone, the precise collection of atoms going to make up S? Because every discrete-time signal can be represented as a superposition of spikes alone, or as a superposition of sinusoids alone, there is no unique way of writing S as a sum of spikes and sinusoids in general. We prove that if S is representable as a highly sparse superposition of atoms from this time-frequency dictionary, then there is only one such highly sparse representation of S, and it can be obtained by solving the convex optimization problem of minimizing the l/sup 1/ norm of the coefficients among all decompositions. Here "highly sparse" means that N/sub t/+N/sub w/

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/18.959265

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,949

Metadata

Authors
Donoho, D. L., & Huo, X.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Published
2001
Volume
47
Issue
7
Pages
2845-2862
ISSN
0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099641086
Cited by
1,949
References
1
FWCI
23.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.