The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thermal effect limits in ultrahigh-density magnetic recording
Abstract
In current longitudinal magnetic recording media, high areal density and low noise are achieved by statistical averaging over several hundred weakly coupled ferromagnetic grains per bit cell. Continued scaling to smaller bit and grain sizes, however, may prompt spontaneous magnetization reversal processes when the stored energy per particle starts competing with thermal energy, thereby limiting the achievable areal density. Charap et al. have predicted this to occur at about 40 Gbits/in/sup 2/. This paper discusses thermal effects in the framework of basic Arrhenius-Neel statistical switching models. It is emphasized that magnetization decay is intimately related to high-speed-switching phenomena. Thickness-, temperature- and bit-density dependent recording experiments reveal the onset of thermal decay at "stability ratios" (K/sub u/V/K/sub B/T)/sub 0//spl sime/35 /spl plusmn/ 2. The stability requirement is grain size dispersion dependent and shifts to about 60 for projected 40 Gbits/in/sup 2/ conditions and ten-year storage times. Higher anisotropy and coercivity media with reduced grain sizes are logical extensions of the current technology until write field limitations are reached. Future advancements will rely on deviations from traditional scaling. Squarer bits may reduce destabilizing stray fields inside the bit transitions. Perpendicular recording may shift the onset of thermal effects to higher bit densities. Enhanced signal processing may allow signal retrieval with fewer grains per bit. Finally, single grain per bit recording may be envisioned in patterned media, with lithographically defined bits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thermal Fluctuations of a Single-Domain Particle
Brown, W. F. (1963) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.130.1677 · Cited by 3,374
Cited by
Monodisperse FePt Nanoparticles and Ferromagnetic FePt Nanocrystal Superlattices
Sun, S., Murray, C. B., Weller, D., Folks, L., & Moser, A. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5460.1989 · Cited by 6,137
Self-citationShape‐Controlled Synthesis of Metal Nanocrystals: Simple Chemistry Meets Complex Physics?
Xia, Y., Xiong, Y., Lim, B., & Skrabalak, S. E. (2009) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200802248 · Cited by 5,702
Ultrahigh-Density Nanowire Arrays Grown in Self-Assembled Diblock Copolymer Templates
Thurn-Albrecht, T., Schotter, J., Kästle, G. A., Emley, N., Shibauchi, T., Krusin-Elbaum, L., Guarini, K., Black, C. T., Tuominen, M. T., & Russell, T. P. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5499.2126 · Cited by 2,104
Exchange bias in nanostructures
Nogués, J., Sort, J., Langlais, V., Skumryev, V., Suriñach, S., Muñoz, J. S., & Baró, M. D. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.08.004 · Cited by 1,925
Shape Control of Semiconductor and Metal Oxide Nanocrystals through Nonhydrolytic Colloidal Routes
Jun, Y., Choi, J., & Cheon, J. (2006) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200503821 · Cited by 1,123
Metadata
- Authors
- Weller, D., & Moser, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 4423-4439
- ISSN
- 0018-9464 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162100547
- Cited by
- 1,226
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thermal effect limits in ultrahigh-density magnetic recording. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/20.809134
- The paper
- Weller, D., & Moser, A. (1999). Thermal effect limits in ultrahigh-density magnetic recording. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. https://doi.org/10.1109/20.809134
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.