The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural networks in process fault diagnosis
Abstract
Fault detection and diagnosis is an important problem in process automation. Both model-based methods and expert systems have been suggested to solve the problem, along with the pattern recognition approach. A number of possible neural network architectures for fault diagnosis are studied. The multilayer perceptron network with a hyperbolic tangent as the nonlinear element seems best suited for the task. As a test case, a realistic heat exchanger-continuous stirred tank reactor system is studied. The system has 14 noisy measurements and 10 faults. The proposed neural network was able to learn the faults in under 3000 training cycles and then to detect and classify the faults correctly. Principal component analysis is used to illustrate the fault diagnosis problem in question.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators
Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., & White, H. (1989) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 · Cited by 21,728
Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function
Cybenko, G. (1989) · Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems · doi:10.1007/bf02551274 · Cited by 13,883
Cited by
Methodologies in power systems fault detection and diagnosis
Aleem, S. A., Shahid, N., & Naqvi, I. H. (2015) · Energy Systems · doi:10.1007/s12667-014-0129-1 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Sorsa, T., Koivo, H. N., & Koivisto, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics
- Published
- 1991
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 815-825
- ISSN
- 0018-9472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154298522
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
