The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An evidential reasoning approach for multiple-attribute decision making with uncertainty
Abstract
A new evidential reasoning based approach is proposed that may be used to deal with uncertain decision knowledge in multiple-attribute decision making (MADM) problems with both quantitative and qualitative attributes. This approach is based on an evaluation analysis model and the evidence combination rule of the Dempster-Shafer theory. It is akin to a preference modeling approach, comprising an evidential reasoning framework for evaluation and quantification of qualitative attributes. Two operational algorithms have been developed within this approach for combining multiple uncertain subjective judgments. Based on this approach and a traditional MADM method, a decision making procedure is proposed to rank alternatives in MADM problems with uncertainty. A numerical example is discussed to demonstrate the implementation of the proposed approach. A multiple-attribute motor cycle evaluation problem is then presented to illustrate the hybrid decision making procedure.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evidential reasoning rule for evidence combination
Yang, J.-B., & Xu, D.-L. (2013) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2013.09.003 · Cited by 719
Self-citationHERRERA, F., & MARTINEZ, L. (2000) · International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1142/s0218488500000381 · Cited by 454
Fenton, N. E., & Neil, M. (2000) · Proceedings of the Conference on The Future of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/336512.336588 · Cited by 317
XAI-based Clinical Decision Support System: A Systematic Review
Kim, S., Kim, D., Kim, M., Ko, H., & Jeong, O. (2024) · doi:10.20944/preprints202406.0721.v1 · Cited by 72
Optimal location of PEVCSs using MAS and ER approach
Jiang, C., Jing, Z., Ji, T., & Wu, Q. (2018) · IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.1907 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, J.-B., & Singh, M. G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-18
- ISSN
- 0018-9472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104179665
- Cited by
- 781
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An evidential reasoning approach for multiple-attribute decision making with uncertainty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/21.259681
- The paper
- Yang, J.-B., & Singh, M. G. (1994). An evidential reasoning approach for multiple-attribute decision making with uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.259681
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.