Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 781

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An evidential reasoning approach for multiple-attribute decision making with uncertainty

Jian-Bo Yang, Singh, M.G.·1994·IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics

Abstract

A new evidential reasoning based approach is proposed that may be used to deal with uncertain decision knowledge in multiple-attribute decision making (MADM) problems with both quantitative and qualitative attributes. This approach is based on an evaluation analysis model and the evidence combination rule of the Dempster-Shafer theory. It is akin to a preference modeling approach, comprising an evidential reasoning framework for evaluation and quantification of qualitative attributes. Two operational algorithms have been developed within this approach for combining multiple uncertain subjective judgments. Based on this approach and a traditional MADM method, a decision making procedure is proposed to rank alternatives in MADM problems with uncertainty. A numerical example is discussed to demonstrate the implementation of the proposed approach. A multiple-attribute motor cycle evaluation problem is then presented to illustrate the hybrid decision making procedure.>

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/21.259681

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 781

Metadata

Authors
Yang, J.-B., & Singh, M. G.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics
Published
1994
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
1-18
ISSN
0018-9472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104179665
Cited by
781
References
0
FWCI
7.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An evidential reasoning approach for multiple-attribute decision making with uncertainty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/21.259681
The paper
Yang, J.-B., & Singh, M. G. (1994). An evidential reasoning approach for multiple-attribute decision making with uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.259681

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.