The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Adaptive probabilities of crossover and mutation in genetic algorithms
Abstract
In this paper we describe an efficient approach for multimodal function optimization using genetic algorithms (GAs). We recommend the use of adaptive probabilities of crossover and mutation to realize the twin goals of maintaining diversity in the population and sustaining the, convergence capacity of the GA. In the adaptive genetic algorithm (AGA), the probabilities of crossover and mutation, p/sub c/ and p/sub m/, are varied depending on the fitness values of the solutions. High-fitness solutions are 'protected', while solutions with subaverage fitnesses are totally disrupted. By using adaptively varying p/sub c/ and p/sub ,/ we also provide a solution to the problem of deciding the optimal values of p/sub c/ and p/sub m/, i.e., p/sub c/ and p/sub m/ need not be specified at all. The AGA is compared with previous approaches for adapting operator probabilities in genetic algorithms. The Schema theorem is derived for the AGA, and the working of the AGA is analyzed. We compare the performance of the AGA with that of the standard GA (SGA) in optimizing several nontrivial multimodal functions with varying degrees of complexity.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mirjalili, S. (2019) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93025-1_4 · Cited by 1,737
Choosing Mutation and Crossover Ratios for Genetic Algorithms—A Review with a New Dynamic Approach
Hassanat, A., Almohammadi, K., Alkafaween, E., Abunawas, E., Hammouri, A., & Prasath, V. B. S. (2019) · Information · doi:10.3390/info10120390 · Cited by 668
Bio inspired computing – A review of algorithms and scope of applications
Kar, A. K. (2016) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.04.018 · Cited by 578
ChamNet: Towards Efficient Network Design Through Platform-Aware Model Adaptation
Dai, X., Zhang, P., Wu, B., Yin, H., Sun, F., Wang, Y., Dukhan, M., Hu, Y., Wu, Y., Jia, Y., et al. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.01166 · Cited by 279
A Review of Bio-Inspired Computing Methods and Potential Applications
Chakraborty, A., & Kar, A. K. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-81-322-3589-7_16 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Srinivas, M., & Patnaik, L. M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 656-667
- ISSN
- 0018-9472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990771923
- Cited by
- 2,512
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptive probabilities of crossover and mutation in genetic algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/21.286385
- The paper
- Srinivas, M., & Patnaik, L. M. (1994). Adaptive probabilities of crossover and mutation in genetic algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.286385
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.