The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Processing fuzzy temporal knowledge
Abstract
L.A. Zadeh's (1975) possibility theory is used as a general framework for modeling temporal knowledge pervaded with imprecision or uncertainty. Ill-known dates, time intervals with fuzzy boundaries, fuzzy durations, and uncertain precedence relations between events can be dealt with in this approach. An explicit representation (in terms of possibility distributions) of the available information, which may be neither precise nor certain, is maintained. Deductive patterns of reasoning involving fuzzy and/or uncertain temporal knowledge are established, and the combination of fuzzy partial pieces of information is considered. A scheduled example with fuzzy temporal windows is discussed.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals
Allen, J. F. (1983) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/182.358434 · Cited by 7,593
Cited by
Temporal reasoning based on semi-intervals
Freksa, C. (1992) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(92)90090-k · Cited by 678
Metadata
- Authors
- DuBois, D., & Prade, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics
- Published
- 1989
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 729-744
- ISSN
- 0018-9472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970065917
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Processing fuzzy temporal knowledge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/21.35337
- The paper
- DuBois, D., & Prade, H. (1989). Processing fuzzy temporal knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.35337
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
