The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A multiline method of network analyzer calibration
Open accessAbstract
The author presents a method for the calibration of network analyzers. The essential feature is the use of multiple, redundant transmission line standards. The additional information provided by the redundant standards is used to minimize the effects of random errors, such as those caused by imperfect connector repeatability. The resulting method exhibits improvements in both accuracy and bandwidth over conventional methods. The basis of the statistical treatment is a linearized error analysis of the TRL (thru-reflect-line) calibration method. The analysis presented is useful in the assessment of calibration accuracy. It also yields results relevant to the choice of standards.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Efficient and robust analysis of complex scattering data under noise in microwave resonators
Probst, S., Song, F. B., Bushev, P. A., Ustinov, A. V., & Weides, M. (2015) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/1.4907935 · Cited by 301
Metrology State-of-the-Art and Challenges in Broadband Phase-Sensitive Terahertz Measurements
Naftaly, M., Clarke, R. G., Humphreys, D. A., & Ridler, N. M. (2017) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2016.2644108 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Marks, R. B.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques
- Published
- 1991-07
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1205-1215
- ISSN
- 0018-9480 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168854778
- Cited by
- 1,285
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A multiline method of network analyzer calibration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/22.85388
- The paper
- Marks, R. B. (1991). A multiline method of network analyzer calibration. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques. https://doi.org/10.1109/22.85388
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
