CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 49Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic PrecipitationCyclone Separators and Fluid DynamicsElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Collection efficiency of ultrafine particles by an electrostatic precipitator under DC and pulse operating modes

Zukeran, A., Looy, P.C., Chakrabarti, A., Berezin, A.A., Jayaram, S., Cross, J.D., ITo, T., Jen-Shih Chang·1999·IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications
DOI 10.1109/28.793383
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

High particle collection efficiency in terms of particle weight/volume mg/m/sup 3/ is achieved by a conventional electrostatic precipitator (ESP). However, the collection efficiencies in terms of number density for the ultrafine (particle size between 0.01-0.1 /spl mu/m) or submicrometer particles by a conventional ESP are still relatively low. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the collection efficiency for ultrafine particles. In this paper, attempts have been made to improve the ultrafine particle collection efficiency by controlling dust loading, as well as using the short pulse energizations. The present version of the ESP consists of three sets of wire-plate-type electrodes. For the ESP under DC operation modes, experimental results show that the collection efficiency for DC applied voltage decreases with increasing dust loading when particle density is larger than 2.5/spl times/10/sup 10/ particles/m/sup 3/ due to inefficient collections of ultrafine particles. However, under pulse operating modes without DC bias, high particle collection efficiency for ultrafine particles was obtained, which is thought to be due to the enhancement of particle charging by electrons.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/28.793383

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. chang, 1997, control of trace elements in combustion flue gas by a corona discharge activated conditioning agent and electrostatic precipitators, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Electrostatic Precipitators, 2
  2. 10.1016/S0021-8502(97)85145-2 · DOI
  3. ching, 1976, electrostatic separation of a charged-particle layer between electrodes, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 23, 308, 10.1109/T-ED.1976.18396 · DOI
  4. lawless, 1995, modeling of electrostatic precipitators and filters, Handbook of Electrostatic Processes, 481
  5. 10.1109/28.475739 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/10473289.1995.10467423 · DOI
  7. davidson, 1990, ehd flow visualization in the wire-plate and barbed plate electrostatic precipitator, IEEE Trans on Ind Applications, 27, 154, 10.1109/28.67547 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/02786829008959405 · DOI
  9. somers, 1994, verbesserung der effektivetaet von elektrostatischen abscheidern mittels akustischer aerosol-vorbehandlund, Staub Reinhalt Luft, 54, 451
  10. silc, 1994, the influence of ultrasound on the agglomeration of fly-ash in exhaust, Staub Reinhalt Luft, 54, 183
  11. yagyu, 1996, recent electrostatic precipitation technology, J Mitsubishi-Juko-Giho, 35, 70
  12. misaka, 1996, recent electrostatic precipitator technology, Proc IESJ96-1-4 Conf, 25
  13. 10.1109/28.73620 · DOI
  14. ito, 1995, collection characteristics of submicron particles on electrostatic precipitator, J Inst Elect Install Eng Jpn, 15, 113
  15. yokawa, 1994, wet type electrostatic precipitator for iron and steel industries, Proc Inst Electrostatics Jpn, 18, 404
  16. 10.1080/02786829208959533 · DOI
  17. zukeran, 1996, effect of water on agglomeration and collection efficiency in electrostatic precipitator, J Inst Elect Install Eng Jpn, 16, 1288
  18. isahaya, 1967, development on electrostatic pre-coagulator combined with after-cyclone dust collector, J Hitachi-Hyoron, 49, 1157
  19. masuda, 1995, electrostatic precipitation, Handbook of Electrostatic Processes, 441
  20. 10.1002/cjce.5450730407 · DOI
  21. aoyoma, 1993, effects of high intensity ultrasonics on the performance of electrostatic precipitators, Proc Japanese Sound Soc 1993 Meeting, 1065
  22. 10.1080/02786829508965341 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/0304-3886(95)93833-5 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/0021-8502(86)90121-7 · DOI
  25. teller, 1991, mercury removal from incineration flue gas, Proc 84th Air and Waste Soc Meeting
  26. 10.1109/28.511640 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/0021-8502(92)90529-5 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zukeran, A., Looy, P. C., Chakrabarti, A., Berezin, A. A., Jayaram, S., Cross, J. D., ITo, T., & Chang, J.-S.
Affiliations
  • Fuji Electric (Japan) (JP)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
ORCID
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Published
1999
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
1184-1191
ISSN
0093-9994 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1109/28.793383
OpenAlex
W2111066736
Cited by
49
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplorehelp/downloads/license-information/IEEE.html (vor)
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Indian Institute of Science
  • McMaster University
  • University of Waterloo
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
Keywords
electrostatic precipitator, ultrafine particles, submicron particles, particle collection efficiency, DC bias, dust loading, particle charging, number density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review