Fabric defect detection by Fourier analysis
Abstract
Many fabric defects are very small and undistinguishable, which makes them very difficult to detect by only monitoring the intensity change. Faultless fabric is a repetitive and regular global texture and Fourier transforms can be applied to monitor the spatial frequency spectrum of a fabric. When a defect occurs in fabric, its regular structure is changed so that the corresponding intensity at some specific positions of the frequency spectrum would change. However, the three-dimensional frequency spectrum is very difficult to analyze. In this paper, a simulated fabric model is used to understand the relationship between the fabric structure in the image space and in the frequency space. Based on the three-dimensional frequency spectrum, two significant spectral diagrams are defined and used for analyzing the fabric defect. These two diagrams are called the central spatial frequency spectrums. The defects are broadly classified into four classes: (1) double yarn; (2) missing yarn; (3) webs or broken fabric; and (4) yarn densities variation. After evaluating these four classes of defects using some simulated models and real samples, seven characteristic parameters for a central spatial frequency spectrum are extracted for defect classification.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Traditional machine learning-based defect detection methods have low detection accuracy and cannot meet the needs of industry.
“However, the above traditional machine learning-based defect detection methods have low detection accuracy and cannot meet the needs of industry.”
From A deep learning model for steel surface defect detection (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 9 · Cited by 443
- Authors
- Chan, C.-H., & Pang, G. K. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- ORCID
- Pang, G.K.H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1267-1276
- ISSN
- 0093-9994 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4255391993
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 18.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications (publishedVersion)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Textile materials and evaluations
- Keywords
- fabric defect detection, Fourier transform, spatial frequency spectrum, textile image analysis, defect classification, characteristic parameters
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review